Fighting for resources: the economics of defense and appropriation

The study of the ecological factors that govern fighting over resources has been analyzed by resource defense theory and evolutionary hawk-dove games. In essence, the models predict that increasing economic defendability of a resource should lead to increased frequency of aggression among competitor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology (Durham) 2005, Vol.86 (1), p.3-11
Main Authors: Dubois, Frédérique, Giraldeau, Luc-Alain
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
aggression
Animal and plant ecology
Animal behavior
Animal feeding behavior
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Concepts and Synthesis: Emphasizing New Ideas to Stimulate Research in Ecology
ecological competition
Ecology
ESS model
evolutionarily stable strategy
evolutionary game analysis
Food security
Foraging
foraging groups
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Group size
Hawks
hawk–dove game
kleptoparasitism
mathematical models
Modeling
Natural resources
population density
population size
Predation
Predators
producer–scrounger game
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study of the ecological factors that govern fighting over resources has been analyzed by resource defense theory and evolutionary hawk-dove games. In essence, the models predict that increasing economic defendability of a resource should lead to increased frequency of aggression among competitors. We question this prediction because it is based on the assumption that individuals that do not possess a resource and must decide whether to attempt aggressive appropriation of another individual's resource face the same economic decision as those that already have possession of a resource and must decide whether to defend against an appropriator's attack. Using an evolutionary game analysis, we explore how changes in group size, clump density, patch richness, and predation hazards affect both the decision to appropriate and defend a resource and interact to predict effects on the frequency of aggression and aggressiveness of individuals. Our model predicts that increasing group size should result in a dome-shaped response of frequency of aggression and a slight decrease in aggressiveness. Increasing clump density is predicted to increase both the frequency of aggression and aggressiveness while increases in clump richness result in reduced aggressiveness at high richness values and a decelerated increase in the frequency of aggression. Finally, predation risk is predicted to increase the frequency of aggression only slightly but to lead to increases in aggressiveness. We compare these predictions to earlier resource defense models. We conclude that most experimental findings agree with our model's predictions but call for explicit experimental tests of our predictions concerning the frequency of aggression and aggressiveness.
ISSN:0012-9658
1939-9170
DOI:10.1890/04-0566