Respiratory sensitization to diphenyl-methane-4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI) in guinea pigs : Impact of particle size on induction and elicitation of response

The impact of particle size of aerosolized polymeric diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI) for the induction and elicitation of respiratory sensitization was evaluated. Four groups of 16 female guinea pigs each received either the vehicle, repeated intradermal (id) injections (3 x 0.3% MDI),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Toxicological sciences 2000-07, Vol.56 (1), p.105-113
Main Authors: PAULUHN, J, THIEL, A, EMURA, M, MOHR, U
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Administration, Inhalation
Aerosols
Allergens
Allergic diseases
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases
diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Eosinophilia - chemically induced
Eosinophilia - pathology
Eosinophils - drug effects
Eosinophils - pathology
Female
Guinea Pigs
Immunoglobulin G - biosynthesis
Immunopathology
Injections, Intradermal
Isocyanates - immunology
Isocyanates - toxicity
Medical sciences
Particle Size
Respiration - drug effects
Respiratory and ent allergic diseases
Respiratory Hypersensitivity - chemically induced
Respiratory Hypersensitivity - physiopathology
Respiratory Mucosa - cytology
Respiratory Mucosa - drug effects
Respiratory Mucosa - pathology
Toxicology
Various organic compounds
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The impact of particle size of aerosolized polymeric diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI) for the induction and elicitation of respiratory sensitization was evaluated. Four groups of 16 female guinea pigs each received either the vehicle, repeated intradermal (id) injections (3 x 0.3% MDI), one high-level inhalation exposure of 15 min to 135 mg MDI/m(3) air using a small aerosol (MMAD approximately 1.7 microm) or large aerosol (MMAD approximately 3.8 microm). Three weeks later, animals were challenged subsequently with two ramped concentrations of MDI aerosol (average concentrations 16 and 49 mg/m(3) air, each for 15 min) and two different particle sizes, i.e., the MMAD was either approximately 1.6 microm or approximately 5.1 microm for the small- and large-size aerosol, respectively. Respiratory sensitization was assessed by two endpoints: the measurement of respiratory rate, and examination of influx of eosinophilic granulocytes into the mucosa and submucosa of the trachea, bronchi, and lung-associated lymph nodes (LALN). The recruitment of eosinophilic granulocytes into bronchial tissues was subdivided as follows: muscularis mucosae, submucosa, and perivascular. From measurements of respiratory rate, it would appear that guinea pigs sensitized by id injections or by inhalation exposure with the large aerosol tended to display a higher responsiveness than naive controls when challenged with the small aerosol. The recruitment of eosinophilic granulocytes in the bronchial tissue was greater in both inhalation induction groups as compared to the vehicle control. It appears that there was a somewhat greater response in animals sensitized by id injections or by inhalation exposure with the large aerosol and challenged with the small aerosol. Topographically, this difference was apparent only at the bronchial perivascular level and lung-associated lymph nodes (LALN), whereas at the submucosal and muscularis mucosae level the impact on particle size tended to be less pronounced. In summary, this study suggests that a brief, high-level inhalation exposure of MDI aerosol caused a sensitization of bronchial tissues in guinea pigs. The higher sensitization potency of the large aerosol may possibly be related to a dosimetric phenomenon because of the greater fraction of deposition of large particles within the upper respiratory tract. Overall, challenge exposures with this type of irritant aerosol appear to evoke more consistent effects when the MMAD is in the ra
ISSN:1096-6080
1096-0929
1096-0929
DOI:10.1093/toxsci/56.1.105