Loading…

Rituximab versus a watch-and-wait approach in patients with advanced-stage, asymptomatic, non-bulky follicular lymphoma: an open-label randomised phase 3 trial

Summary Background Patients with advanced-stage, low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma have conventionally undergone watchful waiting until disease progression. We assessed whether rituximab use could delay the need for chemotherapy or radiotherapy compared with watchful waiting and the effect of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The lancet oncology 2014-04, Vol.15 (4), p.424-435
Main Authors: Ardeshna, Kirit M, Dr, Qian, Wendi, PhD, Smith, Paul, MSc, Braganca, Nivette, MSc, Lowry, Lisa, FRCPath, Patrick, Pip, PhD, Warden, June, MSc, Stevens, Lindsey, Pocock, Christopher F E, PhD, Miall, Fiona, MD, Cunningham, David, Prof, Davies, John, FRCP, Jack, Andrew, FRCP, Stephens, Richard, MA, Walewski, Jan, MD, Ferhanoglu, Burhan, Prof, Bradstock, Ken, Prof, Linch, David C, Prof
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background Patients with advanced-stage, low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma have conventionally undergone watchful waiting until disease progression. We assessed whether rituximab use could delay the need for chemotherapy or radiotherapy compared with watchful waiting and the effect of this strategy on quality of life (QoL). Methods Asymptomatic patients (aged ≥18 years) with low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma (grades 1, 2, and 3a) were randomly assigned centrally (1:1:1), by the minimisation approach stratified by institution, grade, stage, and age, to watchful waiting, rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks (rituximab induction), or rituximab induction followed by a maintenance schedule of 12 further infusions given at 2-monthly intervals for 2 years (maintenance rituximab). On Sept 30, 2007, recruitment into the rituximab induction group was closed and the study was amended to a two-arm study. The primary endpoints were time to start of new treatment and QoL at month 7 (ie, 6 months after completion of rituximab induction). All randomly assigned patients were included in the analysis of time to start of new treatment on an intention-to-treat basis. The main study is now completed and is in long-term follow-up. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00112931. Findings Between Oct 15, 2004, and March 25, 2009, 379 patients from 118 centres in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Turkey, and Poland were randomly assigned to watchful waiting or maintenance rituximab. 84 patients were recruited to the rituximab induction group before it was closed early. There was a significant difference in the time to start of new treatment, with 46% (95% CI 39–53) of patients in the watchful waiting group not needing treatment at 3 years compared with 88% (83–92) in the maintenance rituximab group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·21, 95% CI 0·14–0·31; p
ISSN:1470-2045
1474-5488
DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70027-0