Loading…
Nitrogen and carbon mineralization in soil amended with d- and l-leucine
The rates of gross C mineralization over short-term (0–6 h) and longer-term (0–6 d) incubation of soil amended with the l- and d-enantiomers of leucine have been determined from the CO 2 production. The rates of N mineralization over 6 d incubations of similarly amended soils were determined by 15N...
Saved in:
Published in: | Soil biology & biochemistry 1999-10, Vol.31 (11), p.1573-1578 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The rates of gross C mineralization over short-term (0–6 h) and longer-term (0–6 d) incubation of soil amended with the
l- and
d-enantiomers of leucine have been determined from the CO
2 production. The rates of N mineralization over 6 d incubations of similarly amended soils were determined by
15N isotope pool dilution for gross N mineralization and both α-amino N disappearance and NH
4
+ accumulation for net N mineralization. The rates of net and gross N mineralization and of C mineralization from
d-leucine were all significantly less than those from
l-leucine and we present the first data for mineralization of N from a
d-amino acid in soil. The hypothesis that the onset of rapid utilization of
d-leucine by microorganisms was delayed whilst deamination occurred to yield an achiral keto-acid was not supported because the pulse in gross N mineralization following
d-leucine addition to the soil was coincident with that of C mineralization and occurred later than the pulse of gross N mineralization in soil amended with
l-leucine. By the time all the added amino acid had disappeared from the extractable pool, 26% of the N added as
l-leucine had been taken up and possibly assimilated by the soil microorganisms compared with 47% for
d-leucine. Based on these estimates of N assimilation, the C:N ratio of the microorganisms assimilating
l-leucine could have been nearly twice that of the microorganisms assimilating
d-leucine. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0038-0717 1879-3428 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00083-8 |