Loading…

Effect of hydrothermal treatment on physicochemical and digestibility properties of oat starch

The oat grain is often subjected to different hydrothermal treatments to inactivate hydrolytic enzymes that can have undesirable effects on the end-product quality. Hydrothermal treatments may affect the functional properties of oat starch. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of ei...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food research international 2013-06, Vol.52 (1), p.17-25
Main Authors: Ovando-Martínez, Maribel, Whitney, Kristin, Reuhs, Bradley L., Doehlert, Douglas.C., Simsek, Senay
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The oat grain is often subjected to different hydrothermal treatments to inactivate hydrolytic enzymes that can have undesirable effects on the end-product quality. Hydrothermal treatments may affect the functional properties of oat starch. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of eight different hydrothermal treatments on the physicochemical and digestibility properties of oat starch. Hydrothermal treatments were selected based on heat treatment applications in oat industry and listed as HT-1) Ethanol boil HT-2) Ethanol boil and toasted HT-3) Steamed at 106°C HT-4) Steamed at 106°C and toasted HT-5) Covered autoclaved at 120°C HT-6) Uncovered autoclaved at 120°C HT-7) Covered autoclaved at 130°C and HT-8) Uncovered autoclaved at 130°C. The morphology of the oat starch was altered as a result of various heat treatments. HT-5 and HT-7 treatments had more large starch granules than the other samples, however the apparent molecular weight of the starch from these samples was unaffected by the treatment. HT-6 and HT-8 resulted in the most significant changes to the gelatinization properties of the oat starch. HT-6 oat sample had significantly (P
ISSN:0963-9969
1873-7145
DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.035