Predictors of professional behaviour and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: A longitudinal cohort study

Background: Over the past 70 years, there has been a recurring debate in the literature and in the popular press about how best to select medical students. This implies that we are still not getting it right: either some students are unsuited to medicine or the graduating doctors are considered unsa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical teacher 2015-09, Vol.37 (9), p.868-880
Main Authors: Adam, Jane, Bore, Miles, Childs, Roy, Dunn, Jason, Mckendree, Jean, Munro, Don, Powis, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Achievement
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Behavior
Citizenship
Clinical assessment
Cohort analysis
College Admission Test
College students
Communication
Demography
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - statistics & numerical data
Female
Health education
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Medical schools
Medical students
Physicians
Professionalism
Psychometrics
School Admission Criteria - statistics & numerical data
Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data
Selection
Sex Factors
United Kingdom
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Over the past 70 years, there has been a recurring debate in the literature and in the popular press about how best to select medical students. This implies that we are still not getting it right: either some students are unsuited to medicine or the graduating doctors are considered unsatisfactory, or both. Aim: To determine whether particular variables at the point of selection might distinguish those more likely to become satisfactory professional doctors, by following a complete intake cohort of students throughout medical school and analysing all the data used for the students' selection, their performance on a range of other potential selection tests, academic and clinical assessments throughout their studies, and records of professional behaviour covering the entire five years of the course. Methods: A longitudinal database captured the following anonymised information for every student (n = 146) admitted in 2007 to the Hull York Medical School (HYMS) in the UK: demographic data (age, sex, citizenship); performance in each component of the selection procedure; performance in some other possible selection instruments (cognitive and non-cognitive psychometric tests); professional behaviour in tutorials and in other clinical settings; academic performance, clinical and communication skills at summative assessments throughout; professional behaviour lapses monitored routinely as part of the fitness-to-practise procedures. Correlations were sought between predictor variables and criterion variables chosen to demonstrate the full range of course outcomes from failure to complete the course to graduation with honours, and to reveal clinical and professional strengths and weaknesses. Results: Student demography was found to be an important predictor of outcomes, with females, younger students and British citizens performing better overall. The selection variable "HYMS academic score", based on prior academic performance, was a significant predictor of components of Year 4 written and Year 5 clinical examinations. Some cognitive subtest scores from the UK Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) and the UKCAT total score were also significant predictors of the same components, and a unique predictor of the Year 5 written examination. A number of the non-cognitive tests were significant independent predictors of Years 4 and 5 clinical performance, and of lapses in professional behaviour. First- and second-year tutor ratings were significant predictors of all
ISSN:0142-159X
1466-187X
DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009023