Rapid process development using oscillatory baffled mesoreactors – A state-of-the-art review
[Display omitted] •High degrees of plug flow and good multiphase contact is reported in the literature.•There are still uncertainties in heat transfer and scale-up which must be addressed.•Continuous process screening offers an alternative to conventional batch screening.•Future work identified incl...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) Switzerland : 1996), 2015-04, Vol.265, p.110-121 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | [Display omitted]
•High degrees of plug flow and good multiphase contact is reported in the literature.•There are still uncertainties in heat transfer and scale-up which must be addressed.•Continuous process screening offers an alternative to conventional batch screening.•Future work identified includes temperature screening and multivariate screening.
The mesoscale oscillatory baffled reactor (meso-OBR) is a novel technology for reaction engineering and screening applications. The meso-OBR exhibits high degrees of plug flow at low and moderate net flow rates (0.3–8mL/min). For example, central and integral baffle configurations give good plug flow at net flows of Ren=4.3–34 for ψ=4–8 and ψ=5–10, respectively using St=0.4–0.8. Recently, the batch equivalency of plug flow has been exploited to screen multiple equivalent batch reactions in a single experiment, minimising waste generation and reducing process development time. In addition, good multiphase mixing has been demonstrated using a variety of baffle configurations, presenting a wide range of potential applications for the technology. In this review, the characteristics of the mesoreactor that are beneficial for rapid process screening are explained. The results of all public domain reports of the use of mesoscale OBRs for screening are reported and the outlook for the technology is discussed. Throughout, the technology is compared and contrasted with the findings for “conventional scale” (>15mm diameter) OBRs. A variety of case studies are used for illustrative purposes. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1385-8947 1873-3212 |