LOCAL ANESTHETIC-INDUCED CONDUCTION BLOCK AND NERVE-FIBER INJURY IN STREPTOZOTOCIN DIABETIC RATS

Patients with diabetes may have peripheral neuropathy, which may have clinical implications for the use of regional nerve block. The effects of local anesthetics on nerve conduction and nerve fiber injury were tested in control rats and at 4 weeks after the onset of diabetes in rats injected with st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 1992-11, Vol.77 (5), p.941-947
Main Authors: KALICHMAN, MW, CALCUTT, NA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anesthesiology
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental - physiopathology
Female
Lidocaine - toxicity
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medical sciences
Nerve Fibers - drug effects
Nerve Fibers - physiology
Neural Conduction - drug effects
Neural Conduction - physiology
Neuropharmacology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Procaine - toxicity
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Science & Technology
Streptozocin
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Patients with diabetes may have peripheral neuropathy, which may have clinical implications for the use of regional nerve block. The effects of local anesthetics on nerve conduction and nerve fiber injury were tested in control rats and at 4 weeks after the onset of diabetes in rats injected with streptozotocin (50 mg/kg intraperitoneally). Nerve conduction was assessed by recording evoked electrical activity in hindpaw muscles following ipsilateral electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve near the hip. Block of motor nerve conduction was quantified by recording the amplitude of the evoked response at 1-min intervals for up to 15 min after the injection of 500 mul 1% lidocaine HCl or procaine HCl into the midthigh next to the sciatic nerve. In control animals, procaine was much less effective than lidocaine in producing conduction block. The rate and magnitude of lidocaine-induced conduction block were not significantly different between control and diabetic groups. However, conduction block due to procaine was sufficiently enhanced in diabetic rats to become comparable to that of lidocaine-treated control nerves. Long-lasting injury was assessed in sciatic nerve harvested 2 days after the extraneural injection of saline or 2 or 4% lidocaine HCl. Using a light microscope with a superimposed grid, nerve edema was quantified as the proportion of intersection points falling on extracellular space. Lidocaine induced edema in both control and diabetic nerves, but 4% lidocaine induced significantly more edema in diabetic nerves than in controls. Nerve fiber injury, based on light microscopic scoring of axonal degeneration and demyelination, was not observed in saline-treated nerves. Injury was evident in all lidocaine groups and was significantly greater for lidocaine-treated diabetic nerves compared to lidocaine-treated controls. These data support the proposals that, in diabetes, local anesthetic requirement is reduced and that the risk of local anesthetic-induced nerve injury is increased.
ISSN:0003-3022
1528-1175
DOI:10.1097/00000542-199211000-00017