Loading…
Should Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Be a Rescue Therapy for Inotrope-Dependent Patients With Advanced Heart Failure?
Abstract Background Although the “off-label usage” of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) has spread recently in advanced heart failure (HF) patients in the real-world practice, its clinical effect remained uncertain. Methods and Results A total of 84 in-hospital 690 pg/mL)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cardiac failure 2015-06, Vol.21 (6), p.535-538 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Background Although the “off-label usage” of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) has spread recently in advanced heart failure (HF) patients in the real-world practice, its clinical effect remained uncertain. Methods and Results A total of 84 in-hospital 690 pg/mL) at the time of CRT-D implantation were independent predictors of cardiac death within a year by Cox regression analyses ( P < 0.05 for both). These 2 parameters could significantly stratify 1-year ventricular assist device (VAD)-free survival: inotrope-free low (1) or high BNP (2), or inotrope-dependent low (3) or high BNP groups (4) (98, 77, 57, and 17%, respectively, P < 0.001). In contrast, there were no significant differences in actual 1-year survival among the four groups. Conclusion Patients dependent on inotropes sometimes receive CRT-D therapy as the last treatment resort in clinical practice, but LVAD implantation should be considered instead of CRT-D in advanced HF patients because of their poor prognosis with CRT-D therapy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1071-9164 1532-8414 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.04.009 |