Loading…

Should Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Be a Rescue Therapy for Inotrope-Dependent Patients With Advanced Heart Failure?

Abstract Background Although the “off-label usage” of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) has spread recently in advanced heart failure (HF) patients in the real-world practice, its clinical effect remained uncertain. Methods and Results A total of 84 in-hospital 690 pg/mL)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiac failure 2015-06, Vol.21 (6), p.535-538
Main Authors: Imamura, Teruhiko, MD, PhD, Kinugawa, Koichiro, MD, PhD, Nitta, Daisuke, MD, Hatano, Masaru, MD, Komuro, Issei, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Although the “off-label usage” of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) has spread recently in advanced heart failure (HF) patients in the real-world practice, its clinical effect remained uncertain. Methods and Results A total of 84 in-hospital 690 pg/mL) at the time of CRT-D implantation were independent predictors of cardiac death within a year by Cox regression analyses ( P < 0.05 for both). These 2 parameters could significantly stratify 1-year ventricular assist device (VAD)-free survival: inotrope-free low (1) or high BNP (2), or inotrope-dependent low (3) or high BNP groups (4) (98, 77, 57, and 17%, respectively, P < 0.001). In contrast, there were no significant differences in actual 1-year survival among the four groups. Conclusion Patients dependent on inotropes sometimes receive CRT-D therapy as the last treatment resort in clinical practice, but LVAD implantation should be considered instead of CRT-D in advanced HF patients because of their poor prognosis with CRT-D therapy.
ISSN:1071-9164
1532-8414
DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.04.009