Loading…

Outcomes After Nonemergent Electrical Cardioversion for Atrial Arrhythmias

Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is recommended for rhythm control in patients with atrial arrhythmia; yet, ECV use and outcomes in contemporary practice are unknown. We reviewed all nonemergent ECVs for atrial arrhythmias at a tertiary care center (2010 to 2013), stratifying patients by transesophage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2015-05, Vol.115 (10), p.1407-1414
Main Authors: Steinberg, Benjamin Adam, MD, MHS, Schulte, Phillip Joel, PhD, Hofmann, Paul, BS, Ersbøll, Mads, MD, Alexander, John Hunter, MD, MHS, Broderick-Forsgren, Kathleen, MD, Anstrom, Kevin Joseph, PhD, Granger, Christopher Bull, MD, Piccini, Jonathan Paul, MD, MHS, Velazquez, Eric Jose, MD, Shah, Bimal Ramesh, MD, MBA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is recommended for rhythm control in patients with atrial arrhythmia; yet, ECV use and outcomes in contemporary practice are unknown. We reviewed all nonemergent ECVs for atrial arrhythmias at a tertiary care center (2010 to 2013), stratifying patients by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) use before ECV and comparing demographics, history, vitals, and laboratory studies. Outcomes included postprocedural success and complications and repeat cardioversion, rehospitalization, and death within 30 days. Overall, 1,017 patients underwent ECV, 760 (75%) for atrial fibrillation and 240 (24%) for atrial flutter; 633 underwent TEE before ECV and 384 did not. TEE recipients were more likely to be inpatients (74% vs 44%, p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.02.030