Safety of Carotid Intervention Following Thrombolysis in Acute Ischaemic Stroke

Objectives Thrombolysis is effective in improving clinical outcome in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. However, thrombolysis results in low recanalisation rates, particularly in the event of carotid occlusion. Carotid intervention is indicated in stroke resulting from significant carotid ath...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2014-11, Vol.48 (5), p.505-512
Main Authors: Mandavia, R, Qureshi, M.I, Dharmarajah, B, Head, K, Davies, A.H
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Angioplasty
Brain Ischemia - surgery
Carotid arteries
Carotid Artery, Internal - surgery
Carotid Stenosis - surgery
Endarterectomy
Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects
Humans
Safety
Stroke
Stroke - surgery
Surgery
Thrombolysis
Thrombolytic Therapy - adverse effects
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives Thrombolysis is effective in improving clinical outcome in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. However, thrombolysis results in low recanalisation rates, particularly in the event of carotid occlusion. Carotid intervention is indicated in stroke resulting from significant carotid atherosclerosis, but intervention soon after thrombolysis may be associated with increased risks. This study aims to assess the safety of carotid intervention post-thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Design Systematic review. Materials and methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched on 29 May 2014. Inclusion criteria were (i) intra-arterial or intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke; (ii) carotid intervention within 14 days of thrombolysis; and (iii) derivable primary outcome. The primary outcome was 30-day stroke or death. A meta-analysis of incidence was completed for the 30-day stroke or death rates using Freeman–Tukey arcsine transformations and assuming random effects. Point estimates with confidence intervals (CIs) were generated and heterogeneity was assessed. The strength of recommendations and quality of underlying evidence were assessed using the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) grading system. Results Nine included publications recorded 114 carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and four angioplasty interventions. The point estimate of 30-day stroke or death for CEA was 4.93% (95% CI 1.83–9.44), representing four of 114. The strength of recommendation and quality of underlying evidence for CEA as per the ACCP grading system was determined as 1C. There were no cases of stroke or death in patients undergoing angioplasty post-thrombolysis (0/4). Conclusions Early CEA post-thrombolysis appears safe, with stroke or death rates similar to that of the operation without thrombolysis. However, the wide CI obtained highlights the uncertainty of this result. Further, we emphasise that this recommendation is supported by low-quality evidence. Additional data are required to confirm the safety of surgery and early endovascular therapy post-thrombolysis.
ISSN:1078-5884
1532-2165
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.012