Payments for ecosystem services and landowner interest: Informing program design trade-offs in Western Panama

Experience with payments for ecosystem services (PES) highlights the effects of program design on landowner participation, impacting the program's ability to achieve environmental and, where applicable, social objectives. We conducted an exploratory study in western Panama at the initial stage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological economics 2014-07, Vol.103, p.44-55
Main Authors: Duke, Esther Alice, Goldstein, Joshua H., Teel, Tara L., Finchum, Ryan, Huber-Stearns, Heidi, Pitty, Jorge, Rodríguez P., Gladys Beatriz, Rodríguez, Samuel, Sánchez, Luis Olmedo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural policy
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Benefits
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation
Ecosystems
Eligibility
Environmental economics
Farmers
Farms
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Households
Incentives
Income
Land tenure
Land utilization
Landowners
Panama
Payment
Private lands
Socioeconomic status
Surveys
Synecology
Trade policy
Trade-off
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Experience with payments for ecosystem services (PES) highlights the effects of program design on landowner participation, impacting the program's ability to achieve environmental and, where applicable, social objectives. We conducted an exploratory study in western Panama at the initial stage of PES consideration to identify potential landowner interest in PES and factors that would affect landowner interest and eligibility. We report the results from a household survey of 344 farmers and ranchers (92% response rate). Eighty percent of the respondents expressed interest in PES participation. Respondents' stated interest was significantly related to farm size, income, age, land tenure, and previous involvement in conservation. We also found that alternative specifications for landowner eligibility requirements, targeting criteria, and other parameters could greatly affect landowners' ability to participate, most strongly for respondents lower in socioeconomic status. We provide a framework for exploring potential landowner interest in PES at the very first stage of program exploration, from which program design can be strategically advanced with realistic PES scenarios to explore efficient payment levels and projected environmental benefits. Our findings highlight the importance of making explicit trade-offs that result from alternative PES design choices in affecting landowners' interest and eligibility to participate. •We examined potential landowner participation in payments for ecosystem services.•Landowners expressed overall interest in participating.•Predictors included farm size, income, age, tenure, and conservation experience.•Potential eligibility requirements would limit participation by the poor.•Stakeholders must weigh trade-offs in setting eligibility and targeting criteria.
ISSN:0921-8009
1873-6106
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.013