Temporal dynamics of blue and green virtual water trade networks

Global food security increasingly relies on the trade of food commodities. Freshwater resources are essential to agricultural production and are thus embodied in the trade of food commodities, referred to as “virtual water trade.” Agricultural production predominantly relies on rainwater (i.e., “gre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water resources research 2012-07, Vol.48 (7), p.np-n/a
Main Authors: Konar, M., Dalin, C., Hanasaki, N., Rinaldo, A., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural production
blue water
food trade
Freshwater resources
green water
International trade
Opportunity costs
virtual water
water efficiency
water saving
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Global food security increasingly relies on the trade of food commodities. Freshwater resources are essential to agricultural production and are thus embodied in the trade of food commodities, referred to as “virtual water trade.” Agricultural production predominantly relies on rainwater (i.e., “green water”), though irrigation (i.e., “blue water”) does play an important role. These different sources of water have distinctly different opportunity costs, which may be reflected in the way these resources are traded. Thus, the temporal dynamics of the virtual water trade networks from these distinct water sources require characterization. We find that 42 × 109 m3 blue and 310 × 109 m3 green water was traded in 1986, growing to 78 × 109 m3 blue and 594 × 109 m3 green water traded in 2008. Three nations dominate the export of green water resources: the USA, Argentina, and Brazil. As a country increases its export trade partners it tends to export relatively more blue water. However, as a country increases its import trade partners it does not preferentially import water from a specific source. The amount of virtual water that a country imports by increasing its import trade partners has been decreasing over time, with the exception of the soy trade. Both blue and green virtual water networks are efficient: 119 × 109 m3 blue and 105 × 109 m3 green water were saved in 2008. Importantly, trade has been increasingly saving water over time, due to the intensification of crop trade on more water‐efficient links. Key Points Blue and green water are traded differently due to distinct opportunity costs Green water exports oscillate over time, while imports steadily increase Both blue and green networks have been increasingly saving water over time
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI:10.1029/2012WR011959