Loading…
Complex aortic surgery in a regional center in the United Kingdom. Should the United Kingdom now adopt a United States–style supercenter model?
Background The United States has established aortic supercenters, which have demonstrated clear improvements in the short-term and long-term outcomes after surgery on the thoracic aorta. This model of care does not exist in the United Kingdom. We have looked at our recent experience of emergency and...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2014-10, Vol.148 (4), p.1428-1434.e1 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background The United States has established aortic supercenters, which have demonstrated clear improvements in the short-term and long-term outcomes after surgery on the thoracic aorta. This model of care does not exist in the United Kingdom. We have looked at our recent experience of emergency and elective thoracic aortic surgery and describe and compare our operative outcomes and 10-year survival with other regional centers and supercenters worldwide. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively from our cardiac database on patients who underwent surgery on the thoracic aorta (n = 318) between November 1999 and November 2012. The outcome measures were adjusted operative mortality, postoperative complications, and long-term survival. Results Type A dissection was carried out on 23.90% of the patients and 76.10% had surgery on the aortic root and thoracic aorta for nondissection. The mean age of the patients was 62.21 ± 14.1 years. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 26 in the dissection group and 19 in the nondissection group. Hospital mortality was significantly greater ( P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-5223 1097-685X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.009 |