The ability of informal primary caregivers to accurately report cancer patients' difficulties

Background In cancer care, informal primary caregivers provide healthcare professionals with key information regarding patient difficulties. The aim of this study was to assess their ability to report cancer patients' physical, psychological, and social difficulties. Methods We recruited 208 co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2013-12, Vol.22 (12), p.2840-2847
Main Authors: Libert, Yves, Merckaert, Isabelle, Slachmuylder, Jean-Louis, Razavi, Darius
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Aged
Anxiety-Depression
Cancer
Caregivers
Carers
Correlation analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Data Collection - standards
Families & family life
family
Female
Health professionals
Hospitals
Humans
Informal care
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - nursing
Neoplasms - psychology
Oncology
perception
Self Report - standards
Stress, Psychological - psychology
support
Surveys and Questionnaires
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background In cancer care, informal primary caregivers provide healthcare professionals with key information regarding patient difficulties. The aim of this study was to assess their ability to report cancer patients' physical, psychological, and social difficulties. Methods We recruited 208 consecutive patients and their informal primary caregivers in 10 oncology units. Patients reported their difficulties on the CAncer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES‐P), whereas caregivers reported their perception of patient difficulties on an adapted CARES questionnaire (CARES‐C). On the basis of CARES‐P and CARES‐C questionnaire answers, correct report rates were defined by the percentage of difficulties reported at least ‘a little’ by patients and by caregivers. False report rates were defined by the percentage of difficulties not reported at least ‘a little’ by patients and reported by caregivers. Patients and their caregivers also provided their distress levels (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and coping strategies. Results Caregivers correctly reported 67% of physical, 69% of psychological, and 40% of social difficulties experienced in patients. Caregivers falsely reported 28% of physical, 37% of psychological, and 22% of social difficulties not experienced by patients. Significant correlations were found between all correct and false reported rates. Patient and caregiver characteristics were weakly associated with caregivers' correct and false reports. Conclusions Family primary caregivers correctly reported approximately two thirds of physical and psychological patients' difficulties; however, they had less accurate reports of patients' social difficulties. Correct report rates increased the probability of false report rates. Healthcare professionals should carefully evaluate the accuracy of a primary informal caregiver's report in regards to patient experiences. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:1057-9249
1099-1611
DOI:10.1002/pon.3362