Loading…
General Anesthesia Versus Sedation for Implantation of a Biventricular Pacing Device for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Objective Heart failure carries significant risk for major noncardiac surgery. Whether this risk is transferable to minor surgery is less well-documented. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a contemporary cohort of heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2014-04, Vol.28 (2), p.280-284 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective Heart failure carries significant risk for major noncardiac surgery. Whether this risk is transferable to minor surgery is less well-documented. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a contemporary cohort of heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device insertion under general anesthesia or sedation. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting Tertiary cardiac specialist hospital. Participants Heart failure patients. Interventions CRT insertion under general anesthesia or sedation. Measurements and Main Results Anesthesia, heart failure, and outcome data were collected on a consecutive series of patients having CRT device insertion between 2002 and 2010. A total of 242 patients were managed by the anesthesia department during the study period. After exclusion criteria were applied, data for 183 patients were analyzed. Immediate perioperative ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-0770 1532-8422 |
DOI: | 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.07.008 |