Loading…

General Anesthesia Versus Sedation for Implantation of a Biventricular Pacing Device for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Objective Heart failure carries significant risk for major noncardiac surgery. Whether this risk is transferable to minor surgery is less well-documented. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a contemporary cohort of heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2014-04, Vol.28 (2), p.280-284
Main Authors: Theron, Paul, MBChB, FRCA, Guha, Kaushik, MBBS, BSc(Hons), MRCP, Mantziari, Lilian, MD, PhD, Salahuddin, Salman, MD, DM, Sharma, Rakesh, MBBS(Hons), BSc(Hons), MRCP, PhD, Jaggar, Sian, MBBS, BSc, FRCA, FFPMRCA, MD, CertMedEd
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective Heart failure carries significant risk for major noncardiac surgery. Whether this risk is transferable to minor surgery is less well-documented. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a contemporary cohort of heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device insertion under general anesthesia or sedation. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting Tertiary cardiac specialist hospital. Participants Heart failure patients. Interventions CRT insertion under general anesthesia or sedation. Measurements and Main Results Anesthesia, heart failure, and outcome data were collected on a consecutive series of patients having CRT device insertion between 2002 and 2010. A total of 242 patients were managed by the anesthesia department during the study period. After exclusion criteria were applied, data for 183 patients were analyzed. Immediate perioperative (
ISSN:1053-0770
1532-8422
DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2013.07.008