Loading…

Critical Analysis of a Hypothesis of the Planetary Tidal Influence on Solar Activity

The present work is a critical revision of the hypothesis of the planetary tidal influence on solar activity published by Abreu et al. ( Astron. Astrophys. 548 , A88, 2012 ; called A12 here). A12 describes the hypothesis that planets can have an impact on the solar tachocline and therefore on solar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Solar physics 2014-06, Vol.289 (6), p.2333-2342
Main Authors: Poluianov, S., Usoskin, I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present work is a critical revision of the hypothesis of the planetary tidal influence on solar activity published by Abreu et al. ( Astron. Astrophys. 548 , A88, 2012 ; called A12 here). A12 describes the hypothesis that planets can have an impact on the solar tachocline and therefore on solar activity. We checked the procedure and results of A12, namely the algorithm of planetary tidal torque calculation and the wavelet coherence between torque and heliospheric modulation potential. We found that the claimed peaks in long-period range of the torque spectrum are artefacts caused by the calculation algorithm ( viz. aliasing effect). Also the statistical significance of the results of the wavelet coherence is found to be overestimated by an incorrect choice of the background assumption of red noise. Using a more conservative non-parametric random-phase method, we found that the long-period coherence between planetary torque and heliospheric modulation potential becomes insignificant. Thus we conclude that the considered hypothesis of planetary tidal influence on solar activity is not based on a solid ground.
ISSN:0038-0938
1573-093X
DOI:10.1007/s11207-014-0475-0