Comparison of different strategies of ivabradine premedication for heart rate reduction before coronary computed tomography angiography

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of different strategies of ivabradine therapy by comparing the effects on heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and image quality of coronary CT angiography (CTA). Methods A total of 192 consecutive patients were ran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography 2014, Vol.8 (1), p.77-82
Main Authors: Celik, Omer, MD, Atasoy, Mehmet M., MD, Erturk, Mehmet, MD, Yalcin, Arif A., MD, Aksu, Hale U., MD, Diker, Mustafa, MD, Akturk, Faruk I., MD, Erkanli, Korhan, MD, Atasoy, Isil, MD, Kiris, Adem, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Benzazepines - administration & dosage
Benzazepines - adverse effects
Cardiovascular
Coronary Angiography - methods
Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology
Coronary CT
Different strategies
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Heart Rate - drug effects
Humans
Ivabradine
Male
Middle Aged
Multidetector CT
Premedication - adverse effects
Premedication - methods
Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Safety
Sensitivity and Specificity
Single dose versus multiple dose
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of different strategies of ivabradine therapy by comparing the effects on heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and image quality of coronary CT angiography (CTA). Methods A total of 192 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups of oral premedication with ivabradine 15 mg (single dose), 10 mg (single dose), and 5 mg twice daily for 5 days, prospectively. Patients using HR-lowering drugs and patients with β-blockade contraindication were excluded. The target HR was 65 beats/min. In addition 5 to 10 mg of intravenous metoprolol was administered to the patients at the CT unit, if required. The systolic and diastolic blood BP values and the HRs were recorded. Image quality was assessed for 8 of 15 coronary segments with a 4-point grading scale. Results were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test, one-way ANOVA, and χ2 test. Results Reductions in mean HR after the treatment were 18 ± 6, 14 ± 4, and 17 ± 7 beats/min for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. With the total additional therapies, 81.3%, 67.2%, and 84.3% of the patients achieved HR < 65 beats/min in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The mean BP values before coronary CTA were not significantly changed except for patients in group 2. Unacceptable (score 0) image quality was obtained in only 4.5%, 10.2%, and 4.2% of all the coronary segments, in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Conclusions Our study indicates that coronary CTA with premedication with oral ivabradine in all 3 strategies is safe and effective in reducing HR, in particular with a β-blockade combination. All 3 ivabradine regimes may be an alternative strategy for HR lowering in patients undergoing coronary CTA. Ivabradine 15 mg (single dose) and ivabradine 5 mg twice daily for 5 days are superior to the ivabradine 10-mg single-dose regime for HR lowering without adjunctive intravenous β-blocker usage.
ISSN:1934-5925
1876-861X
DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.005