Loading…

Anastomotic leaks: technique and timing of detection

Abstract Background Despite the proven benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, the rate of anastomotic leaks has not changed. This study looks at the time of presentation of anastomotic leaks between laparoscopic and open colectomies. Methods Retrospective chart review was performed between Jul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery 2014-03, Vol.207 (3), p.371-374
Main Authors: Feo, Leandro J., M.D, Jrebi, Nezar, M.D, Asgeirsson, Theodore, M.D, Dujovny, Nadav, M.D, Figg, Ryan, M.D, Hoedema, Rebecca, M.D, Slay, Heather, M.D, Kim, Donald, M.D, Luchtefeld, Martin, M.D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Despite the proven benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery, the rate of anastomotic leaks has not changed. This study looks at the time of presentation of anastomotic leaks between laparoscopic and open colectomies. Methods Retrospective chart review was performed between July 2008 and 2012. Two groups were created, laparoscopic and open. The time of presentation of significant leaks requiring reoperation were compared between the groups by index colectomies. Statistical analysis is presented as paired t  test and chi-square test ( P < .05). Results From 1,424 segmental colectomies, the anastomotic leak rate between the two groups was not statically significant ( P = .69). No difference in the time of leak detection was evident ( P  = .67). Mortality rate was equal between the groups. The overall complication rate of the entire cohort was statically significant ( P ≤ .001). Conclusion The timing of anastomotic leak detection does not differ between laparoscopy and open colorectal resections.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.009