Loading…

Cognitive and personality analysis of startle reactivity in a large cohort of healthy males

•The cognitive and personality correlates of startle reactivity are underexplored.•We assessed healthy males for cognition, personality, mood and baseline startle.•Startle reactivity was inversely related to sensitivity to reward.•Startle non-responders had poorer strategy, working memory and sustai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological psychology 2013-12, Vol.94 (3), p.582-591
Main Authors: Giakoumaki, Stella G., Roussos, Panos, Tsapakis, Eva-Maria, Koiliari, Erasmia, Pasparakis, Emmanouil, Zouraraki, Chrysoula, Bitsios, Panos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The cognitive and personality correlates of startle reactivity are underexplored.•We assessed healthy males for cognition, personality, mood and baseline startle.•Startle reactivity was inversely related to sensitivity to reward.•Startle non-responders had poorer strategy, working memory and sustained attention.•Low startle reactivity may become a phenotype for disorders of affect/impulsivity. Subjects with low/undetectable startle are usually excluded from startle studies but few reports not confounded by this factor, show reduced startle in healthy impulsive subjects, or clinical populations with disorders of affect and impulsivity but also in schizophrenia and its prodrome. We examined the relationship of startle reactivity including startle “non-responding” status to cognitive and affective personality traits in a large and ethnically/demographically homogeneous cohort of healthy males from the LOGOS study, Heraklion, Crete. Startle reactivity was monotonically related to sensitivity to reward (higher in “non-responders”, lower in strong responders). In addition, “non-responders” had poorer strategy, working memory and sustained attention performance compared to responder tertile groups. More research in clinical and high risk populations is required to examine if low/undetectable startle reactivity is a valuable intermediate phenotype for disorders of affect and impulsivity. It is possible that the “non-responsive” status may capture disease related features such as executive dysfunction.
ISSN:0301-0511
1873-6246
DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.09.005