Loading…

Anticoagulation With Otamixaban and Ischemic Events in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: The TAO Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE The optimal anticoagulant for patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) managed with an invasive strategy remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of otamixaban, a novel intravenous direct factor Xa inhibitor, with that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2013-09, Vol.310 (11), p.1145-1155
Main Authors: Steg, Philippe Gabriel, Mehta, Shamir R, Pollack, Charles V, Bode, Christoph, Cohen, Marc, French, William J, Hoekstra, James, Rao, Sunil V, Ruzyllo, Witold, Ruiz-Nodar, Juan M, Sabaté, Manel, Widimsky, Petr, Kiss, Robert Gabor, Estrada, Jose Luis Navarro, Hod, Hanoch, Kerkar, Prafulla, Guneri, Sema, Sezer, Murat, Ruda, Mikhail, Nicolau, José Carlos, Cavallini, Claudio, Ebrahim, Iftikhar, Petrov, Ivo, Kim, Jae-Hyung, Jeong, Myung-Ho, Lopez, Gabriel Arturo Ramos, Laanmets, Peep, Kovar, Frantisek, Gaudin, Christophe, Fanouillere, Karen C, Minini, Pascal, Hoffman, Elaine B, Moryusef, Angele, Wiviott, Stephen D, Sabatine, Marc S
Format: Article
Language:eng ; rus
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IMPORTANCE The optimal anticoagulant for patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) managed with an invasive strategy remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of otamixaban, a novel intravenous direct factor Xa inhibitor, with that of unfractionated heparin plus downstream eptifibatide in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing a planned early invasive strategy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-blind, active-controlled superiority trial that enrolled 13 229 patients with NSTE-ACS and a planned early invasive strategy, at 568 active sites in 55 countries and conducted between April 2010 and February 2013. A planned interim analysis was conducted for otamixaban dose selection. INTERVENTIONS Eligible participants were randomized to otamixaban (bolus and infusion, at 1 of 2 doses) or unfractionated heparin plus, at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention, eptifibatide. The otamixaban dose selected at interim analysis was an intravenous bolus of 0.080 mg/kg followed by an infusion of 0.140 mg/kg per hour. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of all-cause death or new myocardial infarction through day 7. RESULTS Rates of the primary efficacy outcome were 5.5% (279 of 5105 patients) randomized to receive otamixaban and 5.7% (310 of 5466 patients) randomized to receive unfractionated heparin plus eptifibatide (adjusted relative risk, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.85-1.16]; P = .93). There were no differences for the secondary end points, including procedural thrombotic complications. The primary safety outcome of Thrombosis in Myocardial Infarction major or minor bleeding through day 7 was increased by otamixaban (3.1% vs 1.5%; relative risk, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.63-2.78]; P 
ISSN:0098-7484
1538-3598
DOI:10.1001/jama.2013.277165