Between Inclusion and Exclusion: On the Topology of Global Space and Borders

The research hypothesis that we call border as method offers a fertile ground upon which to test the potentiality and the limits of the topological approach. In this article we present our hypothesis and address three questions relevant for topology. First, we ask how the topological approach can be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theory, culture & society culture & society, 2012-07, Vol.29 (4-5), p.58-75
Main Authors: Mezzadra, Sandro, Neilson, Brett
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ambivalence
Borders
Boundaries
Culture
Dialectics
Equality
Freedom
Globalization
Hypotheses
Hypothesis
Migration
Neutralism
Studies
Theory
Theory of culture
Topology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The research hypothesis that we call border as method offers a fertile ground upon which to test the potentiality and the limits of the topological approach. In this article we present our hypothesis and address three questions relevant for topology. First, we ask how the topological approach can be applied within the heterogeneous space of globalization, which we argue does not obey the dialectic of inclusion and exclusion. Second, we address the claim of neutrality that is often linked to the topological approach. Our point is that in mapping a space of flows and porous borders, the topological approach must be grasped in its ambivalence; it can become a tool for control as well as a tool for the expansion of freedom and equality. Finally, we argue that it is useful, perhaps even necessary, to locate the topological approach on the border, investigating concrete practices of border crossing that challenge the very possibility of a neutral mapping.
ISSN:0263-2764
1460-3616
DOI:10.1177/0263276412443569