Deconstructing the complex perceptions of gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation among transgender individuals

Conventional heteronormative beliefs about the nature of gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation are fundamentally challenged by the experiences of many transgender individuals. Eleven self-identified transgender individuals were interviewed about their definitions of, understanding of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Feminism & psychology 2012-11, Vol.22 (4), p.405-422
Main Authors: Nagoshi, Julie L, Brzuzy, Stephan/ie, Terrell, Heather K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Feminist Theory
Gender identity
Queer Theory
Sex
Sex Role Identity
Sex Roles
Sexual orientation
Sexual Preferences
Transgender persons
Transsexuality
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Conventional heteronormative beliefs about the nature of gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation are fundamentally challenged by the experiences of many transgender individuals. Eleven self-identified transgender individuals were interviewed about their definitions of, understanding of the relationships between, and perceptions of their own gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation. The questions focused on how transgender individuals define gender roles vs gender identity, how they defined themselves on these dimensions, and how they perceived the relationships among gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation. All of the participants understood gender roles to be social constructs and viewed gender identity as being more fluid, compared to essentialist, binary, heteronormative ideas about gender. Most viewed sexual orientation as being dynamically related to gender identity. These findings are discussed in terms of an emerging transgender theory of the nature of gender that transcends essentialist, traditional ideas, as well as social constructionist views of feminist and queer theories.
ISSN:0959-3535
1461-7161
DOI:10.1177/0959353512461929