Comparisons of predictors of fluid responsiveness in major surgery

The majority of studies on fluid responsiveness is focused on volume expansion maneuvers in intensive care unit (ICU), while fewer studies have analyzed the same problem during major surgery. Among them, the results are contrasting. The aim of this work was to compare the performance of different he...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pala, S., Aletti, F., Toschi, N., Guerrisi, M., Coniglione, F., Dauri, M., Baselli, G., Ferrario, M.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Anesthesia
Biomedical monitoring
Hemodynamics
Indexes
Liver
Monitoring
Surgery
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The majority of studies on fluid responsiveness is focused on volume expansion maneuvers in intensive care unit (ICU), while fewer studies have analyzed the same problem during major surgery. Among them, the results are contrasting. The aim of this work was to compare the performance of different hemodynamic indices in the prediction of cardiac output variations following fast fluid infusion. The study was limited to a particular type of major surgery, i.e. liver transplantation and hepatectomy. Our results showed that pulse pressure variation (PPV) estimated according to the definition, i.e. within single respiratory cycles, and PPV estimated by PiCCO monitor system are coherent and very similar. Moreover, PPV and stroke volume variation (SVV) produced good values of sensitivity and specificity in separating the subjects into responsive and non responsive to maneuvers.
ISSN:1094-687X
1558-4615
2694-0604
DOI:10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346627