Loading…
Panorama responds to editorial on fMRI for vegetative and minimally conscious states
Turner-Stokes and colleagues' editorial suggests that the Panorama special, The Mind Reader: Unlocking My Voice, did not "clearly distinguish" between patients who live in a vegetative state and those in a minimally conscious state. 1 However, the script contained several explanations...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ (Online) 2013-01, Vol.346 (7890), p.25-25 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Turner-Stokes and colleagues' editorial suggests that the Panorama special, The Mind Reader: Unlocking My Voice, did not "clearly distinguish" between patients who live in a vegetative state and those in a minimally conscious state. 1 However, the script contained several explanations of these conditions; for example, when referring to one patient undergoing assessment: "Staff here will try to assess whether he is minimally conscious with fragments of understanding or vegetative-with no awareness at all." Yet the available peer reviewed evidence, including four of 23 (17%) vegetative patients in a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2010, 2 bears this out. None declared. 1 Turner-Stokes L, Kitzinger J, Gill-Thwaites H, Playford ED, Wade D, Allanson J, et al; on behalf of the Royal College of Physicians' Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness Guidelines Development Group. fMRI for vegetative and minimally conscious states. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-8138 1756-1833 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.e8702 |