Comparative analysis of print and multimedia health materials: A review of the literature

Abstract Objective Evaluate the evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of multimedia and print as modes of dissemination for patient education materials; examine whether development of these materials addressed health literacy. Methods A structured literature review utilizing Medline, PsycInf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Patient education and counseling 2012-10, Vol.89 (1), p.7-14
Main Authors: Wilson, Elizabeth A.H, Makoul, Gregory, Bojarski, Elizabeth A, Bailey, Stacy Cooper, Waite, Katherine R, Rapp, David N, Baker, David W, Wolf, Michael S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical outcomes
Health
Health Communication - methods
Health Literacy
Health materials
Humans
Information Dissemination - methods
Internal Medicine
Literature review
Multimedia
Nursing
Patient education
Patient Education as Topic
Print
Readability
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective Evaluate the evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of multimedia and print as modes of dissemination for patient education materials; examine whether development of these materials addressed health literacy. Methods A structured literature review utilizing Medline, PsycInfo, and the Cumulative Index to the Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), supplemented by reference mining. Results Of 738 studies screened, 30 effectively compared multimedia and print materials. Studies offered 56 opportunities for assessing the effect of medium on various outcomes (e.g., knowledge). In 30 instances (54%), no difference was noted between multimedia and print in terms of patient outcomes. Multimedia led to better outcomes vs. print in 21 (38%) comparisons vs. 5 (9%) instances for print. Regarding material development, 12 studies (40%) assessed readability and 5 (17%) involved patients in tool development. Conclusions Multimedia appears to be a promising medium for patient education; however, the majority of studies found that print and multimedia performed equally well in practice. Few studies involved patients in material development, and less than half assessed the readability of materials. Practice implications Future research should focus on comparing message-equivalent tools and assessing their effect on behavioral outcomes. Material development should include explicit attention to readability and patient input.
ISSN:0738-3991
1873-5134
DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.007