Turkish version of the revised nursing professional values scale: Validity and reliability assessment

Aim:  The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the Revised Nursing Professional Values Scale (NPVS‐R). Methods:  The sample of this methodological study consisted of 385 participants, including senior undergraduate nursing students (n = 328) and cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS 2012-12, Vol.9 (2), p.195-200
Main Authors: GEÇKIL, Emine, EGE, Emel, AKIN, Belgin, GÖZ, Fügen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Humans
nurse
Nursing
nursing student
Professional Competence
professional nursing values
Reproducibility of Results
scale adaptation
Turkey
Validation studies
Validity
values
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-92ac3b93012077f6a279e5b4d1c683da16f62ef9afb9c47f8e1d39c64b4f242e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-92ac3b93012077f6a279e5b4d1c683da16f62ef9afb9c47f8e1d39c64b4f242e3
container_end_page 200
container_issue 2
container_start_page 195
container_title Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS
container_volume 9
creator GEÇKIL, Emine
EGE, Emel
AKIN, Belgin
GÖZ, Fügen
description Aim:  The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the Revised Nursing Professional Values Scale (NPVS‐R). Methods:  The sample of this methodological study consisted of 385 participants, including senior undergraduate nursing students (n = 328) and clinical nurses (n = 57). Data was collected using the NPVS‐R. For NPVS validity, content validity and construct validity were analyzed. The content validity index (CVI) was used to determine item validity. Results:  Item CVI ranged from 0.78 to 1.0, and total CVI was 0.93. Construct validity was examined using factor analysis and the five factors were identified as original NPVS‐R. Chronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency reliability. The 26‐item NPVS had a standardized alpha coefficient of 0.92. Test‐retest reliability scale was r = 0.76 (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00202.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1220568796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1220568796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-92ac3b93012077f6a279e5b4d1c683da16f62ef9afb9c47f8e1d39c64b4f242e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtP3DAQgC1UBJTyFypLXHrZ4EdiO0g9FNRCAVGqQltxsZxkDF68CbWT7e6_x2FhDz3VF7--bzyeQQhTktE0DqYZlTmbyJLlGSOUZoQwwrLFBtpZX7xZrznbRm9jnBLCKVd8C20zThVVSu0guB7Cg4v3eA4huq7FncX9PeAAcxehwe2Qjts7_Bg6C3EkjMdz4weIONbGwyH-abxrXL_Epm2S552pnH_ex5iUGbT9O7RpjY-w9zLvopsvn6-PTycX306-Hn-6mNSFSKmWzNS8KjmhjEhphWGyhKLKG1oLxRtDhRUMbGlsVda5tApow8ta5FVuWc6A76IPq7gp3T8pxV7PXKzBe9NCN0RNGSOFULIUCd3_B512Q0i_i5pRVtCcyEIlSq2oOnQxBrD6MbiZCUtNiR5boad6rLIeK67HVujnVuhFUt-_PDBUM2jW4mvtE_BxBfx1Hpb_HVifnV3-SKvkT1a-iz0s1r4JD1pILgv96_JE_779Toqr8yt9xJ8Aa5GnoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125140758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Turkish version of the revised nursing professional values scale: Validity and reliability assessment</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>GEÇKIL, Emine ; EGE, Emel ; AKIN, Belgin ; GÖZ, Fügen</creator><creatorcontrib>GEÇKIL, Emine ; EGE, Emel ; AKIN, Belgin ; GÖZ, Fügen</creatorcontrib><description>Aim:  The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the Revised Nursing Professional Values Scale (NPVS‐R). Methods:  The sample of this methodological study consisted of 385 participants, including senior undergraduate nursing students (n = 328) and clinical nurses (n = 57). Data was collected using the NPVS‐R. For NPVS validity, content validity and construct validity were analyzed. The content validity index (CVI) was used to determine item validity. Results:  Item CVI ranged from 0.78 to 1.0, and total CVI was 0.93. Construct validity was examined using factor analysis and the five factors were identified as original NPVS‐R. Chronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency reliability. The 26‐item NPVS had a standardized alpha coefficient of 0.92. Test‐retest reliability scale was r = 0.76 (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion:  Our analyses showed that the Turkish version of NPVS‐R has high validity and reliability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-7924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00202.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23181888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Humans ; nurse ; Nursing ; nursing student ; Professional Competence ; professional nursing values ; Reproducibility of Results ; scale adaptation ; Turkey ; Validation studies ; Validity ; values</subject><ispartof>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2012-12, Vol.9 (2), p.195-200</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. Japan Journal of Nursing Science © 2012 Japan Academy of Nursing Science</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Japan Journal of Nursing Science © 2012 Japan Academy of Nursing Science.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Japan Academy of Nursing Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-92ac3b93012077f6a279e5b4d1c683da16f62ef9afb9c47f8e1d39c64b4f242e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-92ac3b93012077f6a279e5b4d1c683da16f62ef9afb9c47f8e1d39c64b4f242e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1742-7924.2011.00202.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1742-7924.2011.00202.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958,50923,51032</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181888$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GEÇKIL, Emine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EGE, Emel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKIN, Belgin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÖZ, Fügen</creatorcontrib><title>Turkish version of the revised nursing professional values scale: Validity and reliability assessment</title><title>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</title><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><description>Aim:  The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the Revised Nursing Professional Values Scale (NPVS‐R). Methods:  The sample of this methodological study consisted of 385 participants, including senior undergraduate nursing students (n = 328) and clinical nurses (n = 57). Data was collected using the NPVS‐R. For NPVS validity, content validity and construct validity were analyzed. The content validity index (CVI) was used to determine item validity. Results:  Item CVI ranged from 0.78 to 1.0, and total CVI was 0.93. Construct validity was examined using factor analysis and the five factors were identified as original NPVS‐R. Chronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency reliability. The 26‐item NPVS had a standardized alpha coefficient of 0.92. Test‐retest reliability scale was r = 0.76 (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion:  Our analyses showed that the Turkish version of NPVS‐R has high validity and reliability.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>nurse</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>nursing student</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>professional nursing values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>scale adaptation</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>values</subject><issn>1742-7932</issn><issn>1742-7924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtP3DAQgC1UBJTyFypLXHrZ4EdiO0g9FNRCAVGqQltxsZxkDF68CbWT7e6_x2FhDz3VF7--bzyeQQhTktE0DqYZlTmbyJLlGSOUZoQwwrLFBtpZX7xZrznbRm9jnBLCKVd8C20zThVVSu0guB7Cg4v3eA4huq7FncX9PeAAcxehwe2Qjts7_Bg6C3EkjMdz4weIONbGwyH-abxrXL_Epm2S552pnH_ex5iUGbT9O7RpjY-w9zLvopsvn6-PTycX306-Hn-6mNSFSKmWzNS8KjmhjEhphWGyhKLKG1oLxRtDhRUMbGlsVda5tApow8ta5FVuWc6A76IPq7gp3T8pxV7PXKzBe9NCN0RNGSOFULIUCd3_B512Q0i_i5pRVtCcyEIlSq2oOnQxBrD6MbiZCUtNiR5boad6rLIeK67HVujnVuhFUt-_PDBUM2jW4mvtE_BxBfx1Hpb_HVifnV3-SKvkT1a-iz0s1r4JD1pILgv96_JE_779Toqr8yt9xJ8Aa5GnoQ</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>GEÇKIL, Emine</creator><creator>EGE, Emel</creator><creator>AKIN, Belgin</creator><creator>GÖZ, Fügen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Turkish version of the revised nursing professional values scale: Validity and reliability assessment</title><author>GEÇKIL, Emine ; EGE, Emel ; AKIN, Belgin ; GÖZ, Fügen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-92ac3b93012077f6a279e5b4d1c683da16f62ef9afb9c47f8e1d39c64b4f242e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>nurse</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>nursing student</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>professional nursing values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>scale adaptation</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GEÇKIL, Emine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EGE, Emel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKIN, Belgin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GÖZ, Fügen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GEÇKIL, Emine</au><au>EGE, Emel</au><au>AKIN, Belgin</au><au>GÖZ, Fügen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Turkish version of the revised nursing professional values scale: Validity and reliability assessment</atitle><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>195-200</pages><issn>1742-7932</issn><eissn>1742-7924</eissn><notes>ArticleID:JJNS202</notes><notes>istex:A41B9AE92B55FFE74EF42CFF1E61BD0D2C753205</notes><notes>ark:/67375/WNG-XZQ05PKP-B</notes><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Aim:  The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the Revised Nursing Professional Values Scale (NPVS‐R). Methods:  The sample of this methodological study consisted of 385 participants, including senior undergraduate nursing students (n = 328) and clinical nurses (n = 57). Data was collected using the NPVS‐R. For NPVS validity, content validity and construct validity were analyzed. The content validity index (CVI) was used to determine item validity. Results:  Item CVI ranged from 0.78 to 1.0, and total CVI was 0.93. Construct validity was examined using factor analysis and the five factors were identified as original NPVS‐R. Chronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency reliability. The 26‐item NPVS had a standardized alpha coefficient of 0.92. Test‐retest reliability scale was r = 0.76 (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion:  Our analyses showed that the Turkish version of NPVS‐R has high validity and reliability.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>23181888</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00202.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-7932
ispartof Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2012-12, Vol.9 (2), p.195-200
issn 1742-7932
1742-7924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1220568796
source Wiley Online Library
subjects Humans
nurse
Nursing
nursing student
Professional Competence
professional nursing values
Reproducibility of Results
scale adaptation
Turkey
Validation studies
Validity
values
title Turkish version of the revised nursing professional values scale: Validity and reliability assessment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T16%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Turkish%20version%20of%20the%20revised%20nursing%20professional%20values%20scale:%20Validity%20and%20reliability%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Japan%20journal%20of%20nursing%20science%20:%20JJNS&rft.au=GE%C3%87KIL,%20Emine&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=195-200&rft.issn=1742-7932&rft.eissn=1742-7924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00202.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1220568796%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5642-92ac3b93012077f6a279e5b4d1c683da16f62ef9afb9c47f8e1d39c64b4f242e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125140758&rft_id=info:pmid/23181888&rfr_iscdi=true