Loading…

Optimization of heart FailUre medical Treatment after hospital discharge according to left ventricUlaR Ejection fraction: The FUTURE survey

Summary Background No clinical practice guidelines are available for the treatment of heart failure (HF) in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Aims To determine how cardiologists manage medical treatment in HF patients after hospital discharge, according to LVEF. Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archives of cardiovascular diseases 2012-06, Vol.105 (6), p.355-365
Main Authors: Cohen Solal, Alain, Leurs, Irina, Assyag, Patrick, Beauvais, Florence, Clerson, Pierre, Contre, Christine, Thebaut, Jean-François, Genoun, Maxime
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
IEC
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background No clinical practice guidelines are available for the treatment of heart failure (HF) in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Aims To determine how cardiologists manage medical treatment in HF patients after hospital discharge, according to LVEF. Methods The FUTURE study was a cross-sectional survey conducted in HF outpatients by French private cardiologists between September 2007 and August 2008. Patients had to have been hospitalized within the previous 18 months with a diagnosis of HF. Clinical data and HF treatments (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEIs], angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs], beta-blockers, diuretics and aldosterone antagonists) were recorded retrospectively, with precise information on drug doses, at two successive time points (at hospital discharge and at the index consultation). HF treatment was compared in patients with reduced (less than or equal to 40%) versus preserved (more than 40%) LVEF. Results Completed data were available for 1137 HF patients enrolled by 424 cardiologists. Mean patient age was 72 ± 11 years; LVEF was reduced in 56% and preserved in 44%. The therapeutic approach was similar in the two groups, both at hospital discharge and at the index consultation. At the index consultation, HF treatment was: beta-blocker (74%); ACEI/ARB (83%); loop diuretic (86%); aldosterone antagonist (31%). The majority of patients (62%) received a beta-blocker plus an ACEI or an ARB; 56% reached more than or equal to 50% of the target dose for each treatment. There were no major differences in treatments and dosages between the groups with low and preserved LVEF. In 15% of cases where the drug dose was not increased, fear of adverse events was reported as the reason. Conclusion The FUTURE survey showed a similar approach to HF treatment irrespective of LVEF. Compared with previous studies, we saw an improvement in the use of recommended HF drugs, especially beta-blockers. However, achievement of target doses could be improved.
ISSN:1875-2136
1875-2128
DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2012.04.003