Alcohol versus brush PRK: Visual outcomes and adverse effects

Background and Objective A smooth corneal surface prior to laser ablation is important in order to achieve a favorable refractive outcome. In this study, we compare PRK outcomes following two commonly used methods of epithelial debridement: Amoils epithelial scrubber (brush) versus 20% ethanol (alco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2012-08, Vol.44 (6), p.475-481
Main Authors: Sia, Rose K., Ryan, Denise S., Stutzman, Richard D., Psolka, Maximilian, Mines, Michael J., Wagner, Melvin E., Weber, Eric D., Wroblewski, Keith J., Bower, Kraig S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Astigmatism - complications
Astigmatism - surgery
complications
cornea
debridement
Debridement - adverse effects
Debridement - instrumentation
Debridement - methods
epithelium
Epithelium, Corneal
Ethanol - adverse effects
Ethanol - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myopia - complications
Myopia - physiopathology
Myopia - surgery
Photorefractive Keratectomy - methods
Visual Acuity
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and Objective A smooth corneal surface prior to laser ablation is important in order to achieve a favorable refractive outcome. In this study, we compare PRK outcomes following two commonly used methods of epithelial debridement: Amoils epithelial scrubber (brush) versus 20% ethanol (alcohol). Study Design/Patients and Methods We reviewed records of patients who underwent wavefront‐optimized PRK for myopia or myopic astigmatism between January 2008 and June 2010. Two treatment groups (brush vs. alcohol) were compared in terms of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and complications at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12. Results One thousand five hundred ninety‐three eyes of 804 patients underwent PRK during the study period: 828 brush‐treated eyes and 765 alcohol‐treated eyes. At 6 months postoperatively UDVA was ≥20/20 in 94.7% of brush‐treated eyes versus 94.4% of alcohol‐treated eyes (P = 0.907). At 1 month a higher percentage of brush‐treated eyes maintained or gained one or more lines CDVA compared to alcohol‐treated eyes (P = 0.007), but there were no other differences in UDVA, MRSE, or CDVA at any point postoperatively. At 1 month 75.4% of brush‐treated eyes versus 70.4% of alcohol‐treated eyes were free of complications (P = 0.032), and there were fewer brush‐treated eyes with corneal haze (4.0% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.012) and dry eye (8.9% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.001). Although corneal haze was slightly more frequent in the alcohol group, most was trace and not significant. Conclusions Although alcohol‐assisted PRK had more minor complications in the early postoperative period, including corneal haze and dry eye, results for both groups beyond 1 month were comparable. Lasers Surg. Med. 44: 475–481, 2012. © Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.22036