Encouraging Active Classroom Discussion of Academic Integrity and Misconduct in Higher Education Business Contexts

The present study assessed business students’ responses to an innovative interactive presentation on academic integrity that employed quoted material from previous students as launching points for discussion. In total, 15 business classes ( n  = 412 students) including 2nd, 3rd and 4th year level st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of academic ethics 2011-09, Vol.9 (3), p.217-234
Main Authors: Baetz, Mark, Zivcakova, Lucia, Wood, Eileen, Nosko, Amanda, De Pasquale, Domenica, Archer, Karin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Administration
Cheating
Classroom discussion
Education
Educational Environment
Ethics
Higher education
Integrity
Organization and Leadership
Plagiarism
Student attitudes
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present study assessed business students’ responses to an innovative interactive presentation on academic integrity that employed quoted material from previous students as launching points for discussion. In total, 15 business classes ( n  = 412 students) including 2nd, 3rd and 4th year level students participated in the presentations as part of the ethics component of ongoing courses. Students’ perceptions of the importance of academic integrity, self-reports of cheating behaviors, and factors contributing to misconduct were examined along with perceptions about the presentation. Discussion sessions revealed that academic misconduct is a complex issue. For example, knowledge of what constitutes misconduct was not consistent across domains (e.g. exam contexts versus group work), penalties were not wholly known, and there was variation in perceived responsibility for reporting and representing academic integrity. Survey measures revealed that self-reported academic misconduct was more prevalent than expected with only 7.5% of students indicating they had never cheated in any way. Furthermore, results showed gender and year of study as predictive factors for issues related to academic misconduct. In general, students were receptive to this form of presentation. The implications of such instructional interventions for enhancing ethical behaviors in higher education classrooms are discussed.
ISSN:1570-1727
1572-8544
DOI:10.1007/s10805-011-9141-4