Loading…

Roughness prediction using machine learning models in hard turning: an approach to avoid rework and scrap

In recent years, the effectiveness of integrating machine learning methods to predict surface roughness in machining processes has become well-established. However, there is a noticeable gap in the literature concerning the inclusion of tool wear as an input variable. In this context, this study pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2024-08, Vol.133 (9-10), p.4205-4221
Main Authors: de Souza, Luiz Gustavo Paes, Vasconcelos, Guilherme Augusto Vilas Boas, Costa, Lucas Alves Ribeiro, Francisco, Matheus Brendon, de Paiva, Anderson Paulo, Ferreira, João Roberto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In recent years, the effectiveness of integrating machine learning methods to predict surface roughness in machining processes has become well-established. However, there is a noticeable gap in the literature concerning the inclusion of tool wear as an input variable. In this context, this study proposed an innovative approach by including tool flank wear as an input variable along with cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut to train three machine learning models: Decision Tree Regression, Random Forest, and Support Vector Regression. These models aim to predict surface roughness during the dry turning of hardened AISI 52100 steel. As a result, all three models exhibited high prediction accuracy, with R -squared values exceeding 90% and lower values for both the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). However, the Random Forest model outperformed the others, boasting the lowest RMSE and MAE values of 0.05 and 0.038, respectively, alongside the highest R -squared value of 0.91. The confirmation runs demonstrated the accuracy of the Random Forest model, with actual roughness values very close to those predicted (variation of ± 0.01 μm). The correlation analysis revealed that roughness is correlated with feed rate and flank wear. This outcome underscores the importance of including tool wear as an input variable for roughness modeling. Since roughness prediction depends on the tool wear level, it is feasible to forecast the roughness of parts machined using the same cutting edge until flank wear reaches 0.30 mm (end of life). By anticipating and understanding roughness behavior as wear progresses, decision-makers can choose cutting configurations that ensure parts meet specifications, thus avoiding rework and scrap.
ISSN:0268-3768
1433-3015
DOI:10.1007/s00170-024-13951-8