Land management policy tools and institutionally contingent types of goods: understanding rock climbers' resistance to and desire for public lands fees and quotas

This paper examines how users respond to 'public lands' of different underlying good characteristics, as shaped by various management policy tools. Using a survey experiment that varies the imposition of fees and quotas in hypothetical scenarios, we analyze U.S. rock climbers' resista...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental policy & planning 2024-05, Vol.26 (3), p.264-278
Main Authors: Carter, David P., Katz, Juniper
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Climbing
Desire
Destinations
Fees & charges
Imposition
Land
Land management
Land use planning
Management
Management tools
Policies
Policy making
policy tools
public land management
Public lands
Quotas
Recreation
Recreational use
Resistance
Rock climbing
Rocks
Solitude
survey experiment
Types of goods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper examines how users respond to 'public lands' of different underlying good characteristics, as shaped by various management policy tools. Using a survey experiment that varies the imposition of fees and quotas in hypothetical scenarios, we analyze U.S. rock climbers' resistance or receptiveness to visiting public lands climbing destinations. Experimental results show that participants are most resistant to management tools that impose financial burdens without promising benefits in return. User receptiveness increases, however, when exclusive public land benefits can be secured. We further show that land management policy tool resistance/receptiveness is conditioned by household income and desire for solitude in recreation. The study's primary contribution is illustrating the theoretical utility of accounting for institutionally contingent shifts in resource good types, while also raising concerns regarding the exclusionary potential of land management policies, particularly in regards to lower-income users. Our study offers guidance for land managers and policymakers aiming to balance conservation, recreational access, and use by shedding light on the interplay between management policies, user characteristics, and types of goods.
ISSN:1523-908X
1522-7200
DOI:10.1080/1523908X.2024.2330531