Leaders’ Impulsive Versus Strategic Abuse, Goal Realization, and Subsequent Supportive Behaviors: A Self-Regulation Perspective

Leaders may engage in abusive behaviors due to impulsive or strategic drives, but it is unclear whether impulsive and strategic abuse can be differentiated and if they have distinct outcomes. The current research, framed by self-regulation theory, represents an effort to differentiate impulsive and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of management 2024-02, Vol.50 (2), p.793-825
Main Authors: Huai, Mingyun, Lian, Huiwen, Farh, Jiing-Lih, Wang, Hai-Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavior
Ecological momentary assessment
Objectives
Realization
Regulation theory
Self regulation
Subordinates
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Leaders may engage in abusive behaviors due to impulsive or strategic drives, but it is unclear whether impulsive and strategic abuse can be differentiated and if they have distinct outcomes. The current research, framed by self-regulation theory, represents an effort to differentiate impulsive and strategic drives of leaders’ abusive behaviors and examine their effects on subsequent supportive behaviors toward subordinates via goal attainment. Leaders’ abusive behaviors, when driven by impulses (strategic rationales), undermine (promote) their goal realization. Because leaders constantly regulate their interactions with subordinates, once they achieve high (low) goal realization, leaders increase (decrease) their supportive behaviors toward those subordinates. Overall, leaders’ impulsive abuse negatively (strategic abuse positively) relates to their subsequent supportive behaviors toward subordinates, through its negative (positive) effect on goal realization. Moreover, self-regulation theory suggests that the effect of leaders’ strategic abuse depends on subordinates’ ability to understand and meet leaders’ expectations; accordingly, subordinate competence strengthens the positive effect of leaders’ strategic abuse on supportive behaviors toward subordinates via goal realization. We first establish a reliable, valid scale to measure impulsive and strategic abuse, and then conduct two experience sampling studies that offer support for the proposed theoretical model. This article concludes with a discussion of both theoretical and practical implications.
ISSN:0149-2063
1557-1211
DOI:10.1177/01492063221132481