Abandoning inauthentic intersectionality

In the time since the term “intersectionality” was first introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw, the term has gained a measure of widespread, even viral popularity. Increasingly, psycholinguists are citing this concept to promote work which more fully engages with the consequences of human diversity for la...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Applied psycholinguistics 2023-07, Vol.44 (4), p.514-533
Main Author:	Tripp, Alayo
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Adult language Bilingualism Child language Consciousness Ethics Feminism Gender Discrimination Genealogy Ideology Injustice Intersectionality Justice Language Language processing Language usage Linguistics Multiculturalism & pluralism Observation Oppression Original Article Psycholinguistics Race Racial Differences Racism Resistance (Psychology) Social Differences Social exclusion Speech perception Towards a Just and Equitable Applied Psycholinguistics Victims of Crime
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	In the time since the term “intersectionality” was first introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw, the term has gained a measure of widespread, even viral popularity. Increasingly, psycholinguists are citing this concept to promote work which more fully engages with the consequences of human diversity for language processing. This piece discusses the ways in which “intersectionality” has thus far been engaged by the field of psycholinguistics. I argue that the common usage of the term “intersectionality” is notably out of step with the tradition of Black feminist scholarship from which it derives. Originally defined as an analytical framework for examining the effect of interlocking oppressions in erasing the distinctive experiences of multiply marginalized people, intersectionality should not be invoked without any serious and specific discussion of oppressive systems or erasure. To achieve a more just and equitable applied psycholinguistics and authentically promote intersectional approaches to understanding language behavior, intersectionality must be taken as a framework primarily engaging with effects of structural violence. The article concludes with some guidelines for readers to assist in distinguishing “intersectional” claims which perform erasure from those which reflect the original and intended anti-misogynoir applications of the theory.
ISSN:	0142-7164 1469-1817