Saproxylic beetles respond to habitat variables at different spatial scales depending on variable type and species’ mobility: the need for multi-scale forest structure management

The response of species to the environment is scale-dependent and the spatial scale at which this relationships are measured may affect conservation recommendations. Saproxylic beetles depend on decaying- and deadwood which occur in lower quantities in managed compared to natural forests. Most studi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biodiversity and conservation 2023-08, Vol.32 (10), p.3355-3377
Main Authors: Winiger, Nathalie, Hendel, Anna-Lena, Ganz, Selina, Zielewska-Büttner, Katarzyna, Segelbacher, Gernot, Braunisch, Veronika
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Beetles
Biodiversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Coleoptera
Conservation
Conservation Biology/Ecology
Dead wood
Dispersal
Ecology
Environmental law
Forest management
Forests
Geographical distribution
Habitat availability
Habitat selection
Habitats
Landscape
Life Sciences
Mobility
Original Research
Remote sensing
Species
Variables
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The response of species to the environment is scale-dependent and the spatial scale at which this relationships are measured may affect conservation recommendations. Saproxylic beetles depend on decaying- and deadwood which occur in lower quantities in managed compared to natural forests. Most studies have investigated the habitat selection of saproxylic beetles at the stand scale, however depending on the species mobility, the amounts and distribution of forest attributes across the landscape may be equally important, and thus crucial to frame quantitative conservation targets. To address this gap, we evaluated the influence of environmental variables, derived from remote sensing across multiple spatial scales (50, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 m radius), on saproxylic beetles habitat selection. Focusing on four mobile and four flightless species, we hypothesized that mobile species respond to habitat variables at broader scales compared to flightless species, and that variables describing forest structure explain species presence better at smaller scales than variables describing other landscape features. Forest structure variables explained around 40% of the habitat selection, followed by variables describing forest type, topography and climate. Contrary to our expectations, mobile species responded to variables at smaller scales than flightless species. Saproxylic beetle species therefore respond to the availability of habitat features at spatial scales that are inversely related to their dispersal capacities, suggesting that less mobile species require larger areas with suitable habitat characteristics while mobile species can also make use of small, distributed patches with locally concentrated habitat features.
ISSN:0960-3115
1572-9710
DOI:10.1007/s10531-023-02663-2