Study on performance of RHS and tapered sections for a multi-bay industrial building

The purpose of this research is to compare and contrast the utilization of Rectangular hollow section and Tapered section for a multiple-bay industrial construction. The many comparison fields primarily demonstrate cost absorption, time consumption, structural weight, and economy of both portions. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sagi, Prudhvi Raju, Badugu, Venkat Rao
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Bending moments
Cranes
Hollow sections
Industrial buildings
Shear forces
Structural weight
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this research is to compare and contrast the utilization of Rectangular hollow section and Tapered section for a multiple-bay industrial construction. The many comparison fields primarily demonstrate cost absorption, time consumption, structural weight, and economy of both portions. The shear force and bending moment are computed in this analysis. In Visakhapatnam, a model with a height of 8 meters, a roof angle of 5.71 degrees, and bay spacing of 7.4 meters was chosen, and a comparison was made between a Rectangular hollow section and a Tapered section with the same size of building. Finally, the results reveal that tapered sections are more cost effective than the RHS. The structural weight of the RHS and tapered sections without crane is less than the RHS and taper section with crane.
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/5.0144439