Added value of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in symptomatic patients with dense breasts

Background Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in females around the world representing 25.1% of all cancers. The high prevalence and need for early treatment of breast malignancy highlight the importance of early and accurate diagnosis. In order to achieve this target, it is necessary to se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine 2021-01, Vol.52 (1), p.8-10
Main Authors: Mohamed, Sara Ahmed Sadek, Moftah, Sherine George, Chalabi, Nivine Abd El Moneim, Salem, Mona Ali Abdel-Wahed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Cancer
Chemotherapy
Contingency tables
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
Dense breast
Diagnosis
Energy
Full-field digital mammography
Histopathology
Mammography
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Morphology
Mortality
Patients
Ultrasonic imaging
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in females around the world representing 25.1% of all cancers. The high prevalence and need for early treatment of breast malignancy highlight the importance of early and accurate diagnosis. In order to achieve this target, it is necessary to select the most appropriate modality for investigation. Early detection of breast cancer by conventional mammography tends to reduce mortality; however, it has a low sensitivity and specificity in young females with dense breasts owing to reduced contrast between a possible tumor and the surrounding breast tissue with superimposition of the glandular tissue obscuring underlying lesions. Our study included 25 patients with dense breasts presented with different breast symptoms, yet the breast lump was the most common complaint. The aim of our study is to evaluate the supplementary value of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in the assessment of symptomatic patients with dense breasts. Results In our study, the enrolled subjects underwent both contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and conventional full-field digital mammography (FFDM). CESM was shown to be better than FFDM in terms of sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy, measuring 100%, 77.8%, 100%, and 84%, compared to 56%, 75%, 46%, and 60%, respectively, yet both modalities showed low specificity, measuring 63.6% and 66.6% for CESM and FFDM, respectively. The added value of CESM was assessed in terms of ability to detect and correctly characterize the lesions in correlation to histopathological results where CESM could detect 88% of the lesions included in our study and correctly characterized 84% of the lesions; on the other side, FFDM detected only 20% of the lesions and correctly characterized 60% of the lesions. CESM changed the treatment plan to a more extensive surgery +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 57% out of fourteen cases diagnosed with breast cancer emphasizing the role of CESM in assessing the extent of the disease, multicentricity, and multifocality and consequently tailoring the most appropriate treatment plan suitable for each patient. Conclusion Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography is superior to full-field digital mammography in patients with dense breasts with a significant supplementary value in detection, characterization of lesions, and tailoring the appropriate treatment plan.
ISSN:0378-603X
2090-4762
DOI:10.1186/s43055-020-00372-2