Improving sustainable agriculture promotion: an explorative analysis of NRCS assistance programs and farmer perspectives

Unsustainable agriculture practices are undermining the world's future ability to reliably produce food. Assistance programmes, such as those offered by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) of the United States, can increase the uptake of sustainable practices, yet implementation of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of agricultural sustainability 2022-11, Vol.20 (6), p.1079-1099
Main Authors: Thompson, Carson D., Severe, Emilee, Norris, Adam J., Gudmundsen, Jacob, Lewis, Mary, Currit, Elisabeth, Newbold, Nicholas, Abbott, Benjamin W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural practices
Agriculture
assistance programmes
Environmental stewardship
Expenditures
farmer perspectives
Farmers
Natural resources
NRCS
Public opinion
Qualitative analysis
Resource conservation
Return on investment
survey
Surveys
Sustainability
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable practices
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Unsustainable agriculture practices are undermining the world's future ability to reliably produce food. Assistance programmes, such as those offered by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) of the United States, can increase the uptake of sustainable practices, yet implementation of these alternatives in the US remains discouragingly limited. In this context, we used an interdisciplinary approach involving quantitative and qualitative data to assess the current efficacy of NRCS assistance programmes and identify areas for improvement. To do so, we first analyzed national reports of NRCS expenditures and acres treated over the last 15 years and then distributed an explorative survey to farmers and ranchers throughout Utah state. Our NRCS programme analysis suggested that historical increases in expenditures have been ineffective at increasing the number of acres treated. The survey responses indicated that both financial and non-financial factors were influential in farmer decisions. Farmers that assigned a high importance to sustainable practices were motivated by public perception and environmental stewardship while those that assigned a moderate importance were motivated by the potential return on investment. Overall, participants in NRCS programs reported more positive outcomes than expected by non-participants. We hope the findings from this study can guide future research and inform efforts to improve NRCS assistance programmes in Utah and other regions in the US and elsewhere.
ISSN:1473-5903
1747-762X
DOI:10.1080/14735903.2022.2056997