The life of the parties: Party activists and the 2016 presidential election

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump secured their respective party’s 2016 nominations only after raucous, spirited debates among delegates at the start of each party convention. Groups and their preferred candidates behaved consistently with the policy demanders view of parties, which identifies partie...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Party politics 2022-05, Vol.28 (3), p.482-495
Main Authors:	Cooperman, Rosalyn, Shufeldt, Gregory, Conger, Kimberly
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Activism Activists Candidates Congressional elections Decision making Delegates Nominations Polarization Policy making Political conventions Political parties Preferences Presidential elections Presidents
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump secured their respective party’s 2016 nominations only after raucous, spirited debates among delegates at the start of each party convention. Groups and their preferred candidates behaved consistently with the policy demanders view of parties, which identifies parties as comprised of coalitions of groups with strong policy preferences that negotiate with one another for influence in the party decision-making and policy process. Using the 2016 Convention Delegate Study, the longest standing survey of Democratic and Republican Party activists, we examine intra-party groups as new delegates are folded into the framework along with returning delegates. We assess how the theory of parties as comprised of policy-demander groups works in a context of high external party polarization. The competition between these groups to recast their party in its preferred image in the absence of a standard party bearer for either party holds important implications for Democrats and Republicans in future presidential and congressional elections.
ISSN:	1354-0688 1460-3683