Effects of differentiation on peak intensity in direct Auger spectra

A companion paper in this issue of Surface and Interface Analysis (Surf Interface Anal. 2021;1–6. doi: 10.1002/sia.7029) discusses corrections for the effects of analyzer modulation on peak intensity in derivative Auger spectra. Today, most Auger spectra are acquired in the direct mode, E·N(E), and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surface and interface analysis 2022-04, Vol.54 (4), p.465-468
Main Author: Grant, John T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
AES
Algorithms
Augers
Chemical effects
Data points
Differentiation
dynamic background subtraction
Interface analysis
Line shape
Quantitative analysis
Savitzky–Golay
Shape effects
Signal processing
Spectra
Subtraction
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A companion paper in this issue of Surface and Interface Analysis (Surf Interface Anal. 2021;1–6. doi: 10.1002/sia.7029) discusses corrections for the effects of analyzer modulation on peak intensity in derivative Auger spectra. Today, most Auger spectra are acquired in the direct mode, E·N(E), and derivatives are taken using a computer program to measure peak intensities (peak‐to‐peak heights) with the background suppressed, for ultimate quantification. In taking a derivative, there is sometimes a choice of the algorithm used for taking the derivative, but the most common method is to use the Savitzky–Golay algorithm. In using the Savitzky–Golay algorithm, there is also a choice in the number of data points used in the differentiation. To improve quantification, Martin Seah suggested using relatively large Gaussian broadening in the differentiation process to reduced effects of line shape differences in measuring signal intensities, as often occur due to chemical effects on spectra. This paper shows the effects of the number of points used with the Savitzky–Golay algorithm in taking the derivative on peak‐to‐peak heights in derivative Auger spectra and how dynamic background subtraction can be used to obtain Auger peak area values independent of the broadening of spectra caused by such differentiation.
ISSN:0142-2421
1096-9918
DOI:10.1002/sia.7037