Effect of head and tail rope‐assisted recovery of horses after elective and emergency surgery under general anaesthesia

Summary The recovery phase is a critical period during equine anaesthesia. In an attempt to reduce the risk of recovery, several recovery systems, including head and tail ropes, have been developed over time. However, the clinical safety and efficacy of these systems have not been compared to a nona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Equine veterinary education 2022-03, Vol.34 (3), p.126-133
Main Authors: Nicolaisen, A.‐S. Kock, Bendix Nygaard, A., Christophersen, M. T., Jensen, D. B., Lindegaard, C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abdomen
Abdominal surgery
anaesthesia
Anesthesia
assisted recovery
Body mass
Complications
Emergencies
General anesthesia
Head
head and tail rope
horse
Horses
mortality
Recovery
Risk analysis
Risk factors
Rope
Surgery
Tails
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary The recovery phase is a critical period during equine anaesthesia. In an attempt to reduce the risk of recovery, several recovery systems, including head and tail ropes, have been developed over time. However, the clinical safety and efficacy of these systems have not been compared to a nonassisted group in a larger study. The objective of this comparative, retrospective, nonrandomised single‐centre study was to determine whether the risk of developing fatal and nonfatal complications after general anaesthesia is reduced in horses assisted with head and tail ropes during recovery compared with horses recovering unassisted. Included were all horses undergoing general anaesthesia at the Large Animal Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, from 2010 to 2019. Analysed data included age, body mass, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of physical status (ASA score), type of surgery and anaesthetic duration. Complications were divided into none, fatal and nonfatal. Logistic regression was performed to analyse the risk and predictors of fatal and nonfatal complications using the built‐in R function ‘step’. Tukey’s honest significance difference test was applied to determine significance, set at P
ISSN:0957-7734
2042-3292
DOI:10.1111/eve.13397