Optimal seismic retrofitting of existing buildings considering environmental impact

•A detailed description of a LCA assessment method for structural retrofit schemes.•A multi-criteria decision-making framework is used for retrofit selection.•Aggregated metrics should be carefully considered in multi-criteria frameworks.•The affect of environmental impacts is dependent on the decis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering structures 2022-01, Vol.250, p.113391, Article 113391
Main Authors: Clemett, Nicholas, Carofilis Gallo, Wilson Wladimir, O'Reilly, Gerard J., Gabbianelli, Giammaria, Monteiro, Ricardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alternatives
Artificial intelligence
Buildings
Business metrics
Concrete
Concrete construction
Decision analysis
Decision making
Decision support systems
Environmental impact
Environmental impacts
Life cycle analysis
Life cycle assessment
Life cycles
Multi-criteria decision analysis
Multiple criterion
Optimal retrofit
Performance measurement
Reinforced concrete
Retrofitting
School buildings
Seismic activity
Seismic engineering
Seismic response
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•A detailed description of a LCA assessment method for structural retrofit schemes.•A multi-criteria decision-making framework is used for retrofit selection.•Aggregated metrics should be carefully considered in multi-criteria frameworks.•The affect of environmental impacts is dependent on the decision variable’s weight. The seismic performance of existing buildings can be improved significantly through the installation of various retrofit technologies. Decision support systems can be used for the selection of an optimal retrofit alternative when several important decision variables (DVs) need to be considered. Typically, the decision-making process considers a range of economic, social and technical aspects that are of interest to decision-makers; however, less or no consideration is given to the environmental impact (EI) of the retrofit alternatives. This study investigates how including the EI of possible retrofit alternatives as an additional DV in a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) process can affect the choice of the optimal retrofitting scheme for a reinforced concrete school building in Italy. An assessment methodology for determining the life cycle EIs for the case-study structure, based on environmentally extended input-output life cycle analysis, is described. Then, a set of five retrofit alternatives is developed using response estimates from non-linear static analyses and their performance is assessed using non-linear time-history analysis and the PEER-PBEE framework. Several decision assessments are conducted, using the MCDM framework, each considering a subset of 13 possible DVs, including EI, to select an optimal retrofitting alternative. The results of the MCDM assessment and their implications are discussed in detail. The main conclusions were: (1) in some instances the expected annual EI may be a suitable proxy for the total life cycle EI when used in the MCDM framework; (2) the use of aggregated performance metrics such as the Life Cycle Performance Metric should be carefully considered when the MCDM procedure is used for the decision analysis, and; (3) the most significant factor affecting whether or not the inclusion of EI will affect the choice of optimal alternative is the weights of the DVs assigned by the decision-maker.
ISSN:0141-0296
1873-7323
DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113391