The neglected politics behind evidence-based policy: shedding light on instrument constituency dynamics

Puzzled by the question why evidence-based policy (EBP) thrives despite evidence against it, we reconstruct the development and spread of EBP in inter- and transnational contexts and find that this process is characterised by some of the same dynamics (including 'structural promises' and &...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Policy and politics 2021-10, Vol.49 (4), p.513-529
Main Authors:	Simons, Arno, Schniedermann, Alexander
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Constituencies Constituency Evidence-Based Policy Expertise Higher education Instrument Constituencies Meta-Instruments Multiple Streams Framework Ontology Policy Instruments Policy making Politics Science Science and technology Science And Technology Studies (sts) Science-Policy Nexus Transnationalism
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Puzzled by the question why evidence-based policy (EBP) thrives despite evidence against it, we reconstruct the development and spread of EBP in inter- and transnational contexts and find that this process is characterised by some of the same dynamics (including 'structural promises' and 'problem chasing') that have also been observed in many policy instruments. We therefore propose a double reframing: EBP is (1) a 'meta-instrument' aiming to establish a particular role for research in policymaking (our ideational reframing) and (2) co-evolving with an 'instrument constituency' motivated not only by normative goals but also by the prospect of securing an occupational niche for itself (our social reframing). Taken together, these reframings reveal the neglected politics behind EBP and prompt us to treat EBP as a political device rather than as an analytical framework to explain how policymaking actually relates to research.
ISSN:	0305-5736 1470-8442