Loading…
Development of a Predictive Equation for Modelling the Infiltration Process Using Gene Expression Programming
In this study, the soft computing technique of Gene expression programming (GEP) has been employed to generate a predictive equation of infiltration rate ( f p ). Infiltration experiments were conducted at 124 different sites and soil samples were collected to assess various soil properties througho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water resources management 2021-04, Vol.35 (6), p.1871-1888 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this study, the soft computing technique of Gene expression programming (GEP) has been employed to generate a predictive equation of infiltration rate (
f
p
). Infiltration experiments were conducted at 124 different sites and soil samples were collected to assess various soil properties throughout the Himalayan lake catchment. Parameters determined from observed data using nonlinear-Levenberg Marquardt algorithm were substituted in Horton, Kostiakov and Philip infiltration models and
f
p
were predicted. Using soil data generated by laboratory investigation of soil samples, the GEP model was developed. Training and testing of the GEP model was performed using 70% and 30% of data respectively. Performance of GEP developed functional relationship was evaluated by comparing predictions from it and aforementioned infiltration models with field observed
f
p
, and by applying overall performance index (OPI) computed using Coefficient of Determination (R
2
), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (E
NS
), Willmott’s Index of Agreement (W), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Expression developed using GEP indicated feasibility of developed equation with E
NS,
R
2
, W, RMSE and MAE of 0.84, 0.84, 0.96, 1.9, and 0.8, respectively for training data-set and 0.84, 0.85, 0.95, 1.2, and 0.95, respectively for testing data-set. Comparative analysis revealed that though with a slightly higher OPI value (0.7–0.8), the performance of conventional models is better compared to the GEP model (0.66) but the GEP model having satisfactory performance may be used for
f
p
prediction particularly in absence of observed data. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0920-4741 1573-1650 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11269-021-02816-4 |