Do Giving Circles Democratize Philanthropy? Donor Identity and Giving to Historically Marginalized Groups

This research focuses on understanding how giving circle (GC) member identities are associated with the identities of funding recipients. It examines whether GC members are more likely than non-members to give to people who are like them (bonding social capital) and/or to people who are not like the...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Voluntas (Manchester, England) England), 2021-04, Vol.32 (2), p.247-256
Main Authors:	Carboni, Julia L., Eikenberry, Angela M.
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Bonding Democratization Gender identity Group identity Marginality Minority groups Philanthropy Political Science Race Racial identity Research Papers Social capital Social exclusion Social identity Social Policy Social Sciences
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	This research focuses on understanding how giving circle (GC) member identities are associated with the identities of funding recipients. It examines whether GC members are more likely than non-members to give to people who are like them (bonding social capital) and/or to people who are not like them (bridging social capital). We draw on data from a survey of GC members and a comparison control group of non-GC members. Findings show GC members and those not in GCs are both more likely to give to a shared identity group—related to race, gender, and gender identity—leading to bonding social capital. However, GC members are more likely than those not in GCs to give to groups that do not share their identity, suggesting GCs also encourage bridging social capital. We assert both bonding and bridging social capital might lead to the democratization of philanthropy by expanding giving to historically marginalized groups.
ISSN:	0957-8765 1573-7888