Loading…

Comparison of LBM and FVM for Simulation of Solid-Liquid Phase Change Problem with Natural Convection

Abstract Phase change materials (PCM) are wildly investigated and used in the fields of thermal energy storage and thermal control of electronics. Numerical simulation is an important method in the research, development, analysis and design of PCM based systems. At present, there are two main numeri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2021-03, Vol.701 (1), p.12050
Main Authors: Yang, X H, Wu, J, Li, Y Q, Zhao, Z X, Ke, Z W, Lin, Y S, Liao, M R, Ke, H B, Huang, C H, Chen, K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Phase change materials (PCM) are wildly investigated and used in the fields of thermal energy storage and thermal control of electronics. Numerical simulation is an important method in the research, development, analysis and design of PCM based systems. At present, there are two main numerical methods for the simulation of solid-liquid phase transition problems with natural convection: the finite volume method (FVM) based on macroscopic scale continuity equations, and the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) based on mesoscopic scale lattice Boltzmann equation. In this paper, the calculation characteristics, speed, efficiency, and accuracy of the two numerical methods are compared, with the classical solid-liquid phase change heat transfer experimental results as benchmark reference. The results obtained in this paper can be used as valuable reference for the selection and use of numerical simulation methods in the study of solid-liquid phase transition problems.
ISSN:1755-1307
1755-1315
DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/701/1/012050