Sustainable Aviation Fuels Approval Streamlining: Auxiliary Power Unit Lean Blowout Testing

An underpinning hindrance in the market penetration of sustainable aviation fuel is the approval process for alternative jet fuels. One solution to this is to develop low-cost screening tools that can be implemented earlier in the approval process. Auxiliary power unit combustors historically show t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AIAA journal 2019-11, Vol.57 (11), p.4854-4862
Main Authors: Peiffer, Erin E, Heyne, Joshua S, Colket, Meredith
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Atomizing
Auxiliary power units
Aviation
Aviation fuel
Chemical reactions
Combustion chambers
Evaporation
Flight tests
Historical account
Jet engine fuels
Market penetration
Organic chemistry
Properties (attributes)
Regression analysis
Sensitivity analysis
Streamlining
Sustainability
Time
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An underpinning hindrance in the market penetration of sustainable aviation fuel is the approval process for alternative jet fuels. One solution to this is to develop low-cost screening tools that can be implemented earlier in the approval process. Auxiliary power unit combustors historically show the most sensitivity to physical and volatile fuel properties, making it a useful tool in assessing potential alternative jet fuel effects at test conditions representative of operability stability limits. It is hypothesized that these observations can be explained via timescale analysis considering fuel droplet breakup and evaporation, combustor mixing, and chemical reactivity timescales on the progression to lean blowout. This paper combines timescale theory with reduced-order fuel properties and random forest regressions to represent each of the identified timescales. Random forest regressions with only these timescale representative properties account for better than 95% of experimental variance across seven very different test conditions. An additional sensitivity analysis corroborates previous observations in which auxiliary power units are most sensitive to mixing, atomization, and evaporative timescales. Testing of these key timescale representative fuel properties requires 280 mL of fuel and could be used as a new screening tool for alternative jet fuels, reducing the time and cost for their approval.
ISSN:0001-1452
1533-385X
DOI:10.2514/1.J058348