Loading…
Influence of hole diameter, workpiece thickness, and tool surface condition on machinability of CFRP composites in orbital drilling: a case of workpiece rotation
Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites are considered as difficult-to-machine materials. Due to good strength to weight ratio and comparatively light weight than metallic alloys, their usage in aerospace industry is increasing where drilling is primary machining process for joining of com...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2019-08, Vol.103 (5-8), p.2007-2015 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites are considered as difficult-to-machine materials. Due to good strength to weight ratio and comparatively light weight than metallic alloys, their usage in aerospace industry is increasing where drilling is primary machining process for joining of components. Material removal using drilling process in CFRP composites is challenging due to its abrasive nature together with certain problems such as matrix burn out and uncut fibers etc. The advantages associated with orbital drilling over conventional drilling technique are now established. Literature review in orbital drilling of CFRP composites revealed that published data is limited to geometrical and analytical modeling while loading a cutting tool in rotation as well as in orbital motion. In the current work, orbital drilling (OD) is performed by rotating the workpiece in an orbit instead of cutting tool. Cutting tool is used for spindle speed only. Thickness of the workpiece and tool surface condition was studied at two levels, i.e., 6 mm and 8 mm when employing coated and uncoated cutting tools. Holes of three different diameters of 8, 10, and 12 mm were drilled. Tool wear, workpiece surface roughness, and diametric error were reduced due to less loading on the cutting tool. Performance of coated tool was found to be better than its uncoated counterparts on all output responses. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-3768 1433-3015 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00170-019-03713-2 |