A Strong Judiciary as a Crisis for Democracy: A ‘Law and Development’ Study from Pakistan

By the late 1990s, international financial institutions prescribed a ‘good governance’ paradigm that sought to empower the judiciary to curb ‘state capture’ by the corrupt political elites of developing countries. Good governance was supposed to act as a midwife to economic development, providing th...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Law and development review (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 2021-01, Vol.14 (1), p.105-127
Main Author:	Azeem, Muhammad
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Civil society control of corruption Corruption Democracy Democratization Developing countries Economic development Empowerment Financial institutions Free markets good governance Governance International finance Judiciary LDCs liberal democracy Pakistan Political elites Political representation Rule of law Structural adjustment
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	By the late 1990s, international financial institutions prescribed a ‘good governance’ paradigm that sought to empower the judiciary to curb ‘state capture’ by the corrupt political elites of developing countries. Good governance was supposed to act as a midwife to economic development, providing the ‘rule of law’ for the free market reforms of structural adjustment programs that had hitherto failed to provide much success. This article examines the implementation of ‘good governance’ in Pakistan, arguing that empowering the judiciary served to weaken an already weak legislature. The tangible issues of popular political representation and economic redistribution were displaced by the discourses on the control of corruption and the rule of law. Based on this experience, the article encourages a shift in law and developmental theorizing to focus on forms of legislature and democratic rule and a redefined role for the ‘civil society’ within this.
ISSN:	2194-6523 1943-3867