PP506 Health Technology Reassessment (HTR) Of A Non-Drug Technology: Methods Used By A Regional HTA Unit

Introduction An environmental scan conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies (CADTH-March-2019) revealed that several health technology assessment (HTA) organisations are currently developing standard health technology reassessment (HTR) processes. Here we present methods used to c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2020-12, Vol.36 (S1), p.40-40
Main Authors: Poirier, Marie-Belle, Benkhalti, Maria, Joncas, Jérémy, Warrari, Ouifak El, Addad, Aghiles, Cheng, Sonia, Mior, Frédéric, Méziat-Burdin, Anne, Dagenais, Pierre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Health care
Hospitals
Literature reviews
Organizational aspects
Patients
Poster Presentations
Regional planning
Resource utilization
Surgery
Technology assessment
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction An environmental scan conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies (CADTH-March-2019) revealed that several health technology assessment (HTA) organisations are currently developing standard health technology reassessment (HTR) processes. Here we present methods used to conduct an HTR of a prioritization programme for non-immediate life-threatening urgent surgeries implemented in 2017 at a tertiary referral hospital in (Quebec-Canada). This HTR initiative was conducted by a regional HTA unit to optimize the programme efficiency and resources utilization as well as to motivate change in the clinical community of other hospitals within its healthcare network. Patient and healthcare personnel satisfaction levels towards the programme were also considered. Methods In this case study, HTR methods and outputs were elaborated using elements presented in the CADTH environmental scan and relevant publications identified through PubMed and in the grey literature. Documents in English and French, published between January 2002 and March 2019 were considered. Key stakeholders were consulted to identify barriers of the programme implementation to other hospitals in regards to aspects related either to the local medical practice or organizational factors. Results The prioritization process was conducted using the same tool applied for HTA appraisal with the additional criterion that the HTR could facilitate the programme implementation. The research processes used in this HTR included: i) systematic review of the literature, ii) hospital database search (efficacy and resource utilization), iii) perceptions of healthcare teams and patients. HTR outputs consist of specific recommendations on implementation barriers and methods to monitor the impacts of the programme. Conclusions In this evolving field, sharing lessons from HTR methods provides information to develop standard adaptable processes to different contexts. Hence, this work applies HTR to a healthcare programme while most of the literature focuses on the HTR processes on drug and interventional medicine disinvestment. These elements represented HTR methods used from prioritization appraisal, research processes for evaluation and outputs used to plan the implementation and finally monitoring from a regional HTA unit. It also showcases that HTR being conducted as a structured evidence-based assessment adds value to a healthcare programme and could also facilitate its implementation.
ISSN:0266-4623
1471-6348
DOI:10.1017/S0266462320001889